lolol.
That's not how it works, Cronos. When I post a link it is not IN PLACE of explanation; it is to augment the explanation I'm offering in the post.
I respect the discussion enough to read the links and discuss exactly what the links are saying.
OTOH, you have not discussed what your link says because you've agreed you do not know what the link is even talking about.
You bizarrely state it's my responsibility to read a book you haven't read yourself. In a debate it's YOUR responsibility to read anything you offer in support of something (who knows what?), and then others can discuss it.
So again, when you figure out what this guy is saying and why he's disagreeing with the OPC, you be sure to let us know.
Until then, we'll know just as much about this disagreement as you do -- which is nada.