[D-fendr]

Thanks for clarifying what you meant. With the original, it can be read either way: the phrase after the comma can modify the previous clause or be in addition to it. Using "by" instead of the comma would have made it more clear.

It's clear now. But you're writing is not a paragon of clarity, including this post. I'm not sure from it if you believe Fatima is real, but I think that's what you're saying.

"The critters have already claimed to government officials that THEY DID [PAST TENSE--AS IN BEFORE THE PRESENT--AS IN, THE PAST--LIKE HUNDREDS AND THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO! HELLO?! SHEESH] BIOENGINEER--IN THE PAST ALL THE RELIGIOUS LEADERS OF HISTORY INCLUDING JESUS FOR SOCIAL ENGINEERING PURPOSES."

Long passages in all caps also make for more difficult reading. And your content is just digging deeper. It is a very bizarre view, friend. It leaves very little if any room for someone having this view to criticize any other view as too weird.

[Quix]

Please count for me the number of posts where I accuse other posts of being too “wierd.”