Well, well, well... Imagine that...
Yet another Protestant backs a statement with facts - No surprise there... Seen it happen over and again.
Yet again (I predict), no apology will be forthcoming for the brazen attempt to discredit the messenger... No surprise in that, either.
No doubt, the previous preference for documents containing a nihil obstat imprimatur will be discounted somehow, and the whole sordid ordeal will be waived off as a fluke of some kind... Ho Hum... We've done all this before, too.
But what is exceptional, what will stick, is the damning blasphemy that the evidence represents. There is no doubt that such "meditations" demonstrate the practice of goddess worship - It just cannot be denied.
...And that which does not blatantly align with the pagan "queen of heaven" mantra, seems to specifically and egregiously abscond powers and titles from God Himself. That anyone could attempt to defend such vile tripe in any fashion shows the depth of blindness and confusion to which they adhere.
But in the midst of the ensuing cacophony, defend it they will, to be sure.
GOOD JOB, Quix!
and they defend it with the same two excuses they gave Jeremiah: It’s our tradition and we like it.
...And that which does not blatantly align with the pagan “queen of heaven” mantra, seems to specifically and egregiously abscond powers and titles from God Himself. That anyone could attempt to defend such vile tripe in any fashion shows the depth of blindness and confusion to which they adhere.
But in the midst of the ensuing cacophony, defend it they will, to be sure.
ABSOLUTELY INDEED.
THX for your kind words.