FOR SURE.
Which shows yet again
that their only vocabulary seems to come from the
Vatican ALICE IN WONDERLAND SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY AND REALITY MANGLING
DAFFYNITIONARY
e.g. “OBJECTIVELY MEANINGLESS”
LOL.
I’m beginning to think very very very few RC’s hereon have the faintest notion about “objective” or “meaningful.”
If, as some are saying, this booklette does not represent official Roman Catholic Church doctrine, will they now go on the record here and denounce what it says? What parts will they agree with? Is it ALL incorrect or only certain parts?