Embrace lies?
There’s more wrong in that book than right. That’s about the most unscriptural nonsense that I’ve ever read.
The reverend’s theology is all wrong.
You can start with the fact that sin did not enter the world through the woman, Eve, and it’s not a woman’s wrong that is to be set right by a woman.
Then there’s the fact that the Holy Spirit is the one who draws men men to God and points to Jesus. That’s one of His functions.
Or is He not needed since Mary is there to do it all?
Speaking of not needed.... The way this guy talks, Why is Jesus even in the equation? Mary is queen of all, according to this blasphemer. Jesus is just an afterthought. Just a technicality to give the appearance of legitimacy so that Catholicism can claim to be a Christian religion.
If this is what your putting your faith in, instead of the blood of Jesus Himself alone, then you are in way bigger spiritual trouble than you realize.
Then there’s the fact that the Holy Spirit is the one who draws men men to God and points to Jesus. That’s one of His functions.
Or is He not needed since Mary is there to do it all?
Speaking of not needed.... The way this guy talks, Why is Jesus even in the equation? Mary is queen of all, according to this blasphemer. Jesus is just an afterthought. Just a technicality to give the appearance of legitimacy so that Catholicism can claim to be a Christian religion.
If this is what your putting your faith in, instead of the blood of Jesus Himself alone, then you are in way bigger spiritual trouble than you realize.
ABSOLUTELY INDEED.
You can start with the fact that sin did not enter the world through the woman, Eve, ...You deny Holy Writ?
I agree, that it is more than a little sickening to read that stuff and then have some people come back and say we shouldn't believe our "lying eyes". Just WOW! Thanks Quix for taking the time to post those pages but I could have told you it would be ignored. Some people are all bark and bluster.