Well I suppose I can't argue with that. :) I guess I was confused as to whether dogmas constituted many things or only a few things. If your list and its associated implications are dogmas then I would call that a lot. If dogmas really only centered on core things like the identity of Christ then I surmised that we would have more agreement.
“If your list and its associated implications are dogmas then I would call that a lot.”
I suppose “a lot” is in the eye of the beholder. Compared to the Latins, we have a dearth of dogma! :)
“If dogmas really only centered on core things like the identity of Christ then I surmised that we would have more agreement.”
Its not only the identity of Christ, though dogma does deal with that, so much as that Orthodox dogma “points to Christ”...like so many of our icons of the Theotokos expressly do. Its all about Christ, FK, every bit of it, because without the Incarnation, the “enfleshment” of God the Word, nothing, no theology or praxis or ecclesiology, at all, makes any difference.
We may agree far more than you think, my brother!