To: kosta50; bkaycee; Kolokotronis; stfassisi; MarkBsnr; D-fendr
Pope Gelasius explicitly condemns the authors as well as their writings
Gelatius' rejection is a forgery. (bkaycee)"Pope Gelasius explicitly condemns the authors as well as their writings and the teachings which they promote and all who follow them. And significantly, this entire decree and its condemnation was reaffirmed by Pope Hormisdas in the sixth century around A.D. 520."
Yes, Gelatius' rejection is most likely a forgery. What else is new?
Is the reaffirmation by Pope Hormisdas also a forgery?
15,349 posted on
10/31/2010 10:29:04 AM PDT by
OLD REGGIE
(I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
To: OLD REGGIE; bkaycee; Kolokotronis; stfassisi; MarkBsnr; D-fendr
this entire decree and its condemnation was reaffirmed by Pope Hormisdas in the sixth century around A.D. 520." Yes, Gelatius' rejection is most likely a forgery. What else is new? Is the reaffirmation by Pope Hormisdas also a forgery? I would say yes, considering that Galasius' forgery is dated at about AD 615.
15,357 posted on
10/31/2010 11:42:35 AM PDT by
kosta50
(God is tired of repenting -- Jeremiah 15:6, KJV)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson