Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: daniel1212; kosta50

I’m a bit unclear as to the significance of your position.

Is it that the Church was unclear or wavered or late in including the Apocrypha in the canon?

This obviously is not the case historically. Is your position it wasn’t really in the canon or that it was barely in the canon or...?

I just don’t see what the significance of your position could be.


15,153 posted on 10/28/2010 10:13:19 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15149 | View Replies ]


To: D-fendr

The issue was when according to RC sources quoted.


15,215 posted on 10/28/2010 7:40:55 PM PDT by daniel1212 ( ("Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out," Acts 3:19))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson