Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Eckleburg; MarkBsnr; Natural Law
We cannot call an individual FReeper “insane.”…We can, however, call posts “insane.”

Boy, this would be about as fine a line as one could cut, half on one side, half on the other:

But your ugly, lying, foul, disgusting remarks on this thread need to be called out for what they are -- insanity.

And:

So I posted to him Wikipedia's entry on "alcoholism."

Nothing personal intended, of course.

I do know the rules. As I said before, a post can follow the rules and violate the spirit and vice-versa. Putting the word "post" or "remarks" near the words "ugly, lying, foul, disgusting, idiotic, stupid, lies and venom" follows the rules, but nothing more.

What happens is sow and reap, inside and outside the rules, on both sides.

Now, have we both broken the rule about making the thread about an individual freeper?

13,663 posted on 10/20/2010 7:28:41 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13653 | View Replies ]


To: D-fendr

You forgot to whine to the RM. :) That invalidates this entire post.


13,665 posted on 10/20/2010 7:38:32 PM PDT by MarkBsnr (A puritan is a person who pours righteous indignation into the wrong things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13663 | View Replies ]

To: D-fendr; Dr. Eckleburg; MarkBsnr
"So I posted to him Wikipedia's entry on "alcoholism."

I know exactly what Dreck was implying with that link. She is too clever by half.

13,700 posted on 10/20/2010 8:23:29 PM PDT by Natural Law (Don't automatically presume the voices in your hear are the Holy Spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13663 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson