[RnMomof7]

Not fully, no. It contains elements of the Gospels, certainly. It references more than it says, shall we say?

Catholics think the "gospel" is Matt, Mark ,Luke and John.. But Jesus said He was preaching this gospel long before the books were written.. What was the gospel Jesus preached? What is missing in Paul's summary ?

[D-fendr]

But Jesus said He was preaching this gospel long before the books were written.

He said that? He could have preached after the books about his preaching, life and death were written?

This is nonsensical and it doesn't help the case from a Paulinian view either.

[MarkBsnr]

Catholics think the "gospel" is Matt, Mark ,Luke and John.. But Jesus said He was preaching this gospel long before the books were written.. What was the gospel Jesus preached? What is missing in Paul's summary ?

The Gospel, according to the Church were completely covered in the four Gospels. Nothing is, to Church thinking, missing. The entire preaching of Jesus is there. Tell you what, why don't you summarize the differences between Jesus and Paul and get back to us. It may take you a while, you know...