[kosta50]

Given the history of forged Letters used justify RCC practices it is difficult, if not impossible, to acept the truthfullness of any of the "early" letters

Excellent! You are on the right path. Now just apply this talent to biblical manuscripts for another bubble to burst.

[OLD REGGIE]

Given the history of forged Letters used justify RCC practices it is difficult, if not impossible, to acept the truthfullness of any of the "early" letters

Excellent! You are on the right path. Now just apply this talent to biblical manuscripts for another bubble to burst.

Though our oldest manuscripts are >300 years old there is considerable consistency to accept them as "sufficiently" authentic.

As to who wrote the Gospels?????????? I am after all a Unitarian. :-)

I do believe the selection of the "sacred" books to be accepted as Scripture was an arbitrary procedure and a choice made by men, not the Holy Spirit. That said, I believe the Scripture we have today is "sufficient" and worthwhile.