ABSURD
HILLARIOUS
(YET PATHETIC)
JURY-RIGGED
STRETCHY REALITY
RIDICULOUS
!FARCICAL!
BRAZENLY FALSE
ASSERTION!
Posted on 08/27/2010 11:45:13 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
Jesus told Paul everything Paul knew, but not everything Jesus knew. Given a choice between the two as to whose words are the primary source I will choose Christ and therefore be a Christian. What you do is your business.
Didn’t finish that — Now you can study medieval poetry and literary convention.
Another one who doesn’t recognize irony when he sees it.
> “Jesus told Paul everything Paul knew, but not everything Jesus knew.”
.
Since neither you nor I have the foggiest notion what Jesus knows, your retort is meaningless.
.
I think that's an utterly indefensible statement, plucked out of thin air. They are neither "everything" nor systematic theology.
It was just a little needle, not a calling out. I don't want to rattle your (old) cage.
Completely illogical...The red letters in the Gospels are the words of Jesus filter thru the writers of the Gospels...
The fact is: they are both primary...And they both support each other...
When and if RC apologists ever get around to posting the truth, we'll all be the better for it.
Tick...tock...
We’ll take that as an admission that you have no proof the website is hosted by Protestants, as you wrongly stated as fact.
Are you saying "Catholics don't believe in total depravity"?
Here's two, both of whom claim to be Catholic, who do.
(stfassisi) "In the totally depraved mind of a calvinist everything natural and normal is thought of as dirty."
(MarkBsnr) "You're just saying that because it is true."
I do recognize a perfectly stupid remark when I see it.
You many not know, but I do. Christ is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent. If you can conceive of a hypostasis of the Trinity that is anything less then whatever you are conceptualizing is something less than God and therefore not God.
You mean THIS WIKIPEDIA...?
The country is historically about evenly balanced between Catholic and Protestant, with a complex patchwork of majorities over most of the country. One canton, Appenzell, was officially divided into Catholic and Protestant sections in 1597.[132] The larger cities (Bern, Geneva, Zürich and Basel) are predominantly Protestant
So your evidence does not say Catholicism was historically the predominant faith of Switzerland, and it does say Geneva is "predominantly Protestant."
I invite everyone interested to simply spend ten minutes researching the subject. They will conclude, like I have, that although there have been pockets of Protestant majority since the Reformation, the whole of Switzerland has been predominantly Catholic for the last 1200 years.
Not according to your own reference.
By any objective standard or independent research anyone on these sites can clearly and easily determine what is right and who is lying.
You got that right.
It's Sarcasm,now carry on.
Catholics don’t believe in total depravity, if some protestants want to believe in it we’ll take them at their word I suppose. If someone believes in total depravity then their world view is obviously colored by that belief.
Just as a Catholic who believes in Baptismal regeneration had better behave like a regenerated creature... and frankly, Protestants should hold us to it.
No, I mean this one wikipedia
While Geneva was historically considered a Protestant city, there are over twice as many Roman Catholics (39.5%) as Protestants (17.4%) living in the Canton.
That is exactly the king of input I would expect with nothing relevant to contribute the to discussion. Show a little pride and try to act like an adult.
Don’t you think you’d look more attractive if you closed your mouth when you had your picture taken? ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.