“lets be precise about it norm, the teaching is that man and ‘god’ are of the same species or race”
Exactly. That is why we call God Father, and we are his sons and daughters.
A little light on the response eh norm? Correctly from the bible we are his sons and daughters by adoption, not ontology. We are clay.
But how does it feel to have to avoid answering the tough questions norm? Why is it so hard to answer why you don't worship Jehovah as the Jews of the OT did. Why is it so hard to explain how a non-eternal god (smith's teaching) is an eternal god? I thought the man who saw god face to face would have the answer?
who was god's savior norm? and his god before him? which god established the eternal principles norm when no god has ever been god for eternity?
Why doesn't the bom provide these answers norm, smith said it was the most perfect book in existence.
Or perhaps norm, the reason why these conflicts are present is because smith never really had a clue to begin with - he made it up as he went because it provided him with the power and prestige he desired - to be held as a god on this planet.
Silence is a poor apologetic.
This statement that God and man are the same is a lie from satan.