Ha! This is just another cowardly attempt at refusing to defend your false and lonely position. Again, every major protestant denomination was either wrong eighty years ago or is wrong now, but none of them takes your indefensible view. It's a shame that you won't even try to stand up for your own position and instead try to change the subject solely to religious populations. You have now effectively ceded the scriptural debate on this thread.
The Roman Catholic church is declining in this country. If it weren't for Latin America, it would be on its way to history.
Now you are just being silly. A few Catholics may get stolen away, but overall the Catholic Church in the U.S. just passed 68 million and the total world population of Catholics just passed a billion while the total number of protestants in the U.S. is declining. You probably know this, though, or you wouldn't have cleverly substituted the nebulously defined protestant subset of "evangelical" for the more objective "protestant" delineation. That's a pretty desperate trick in a religious discussion like this one. Either way it's just reorganizing the deck chairs on the Titanic. Particular denominations may grow or fall while the overall number of artificial contraception-lovin' protestants unceasingly shrinks.
You never answered the question, though. What religion are you and does that religion hold your wacky support of only certain kinds of artificial contraception? You seem to like throwing stones at other people's religions while hiding your own religious identity. That looks pretty cowardly.
You've just lost any credibility you may have hoped to convince us of.
The term "Evangelical" is a subset of Protestant. Not the other way around.
There are more Protestants than Evangelicals. And there are more Evangelicals than Roman Catholics. Therefore there are MANY more Protestants than Roman Catholics.
You lose.
your wacky support of only certain kinds of artificial contraception?
Some methods are harmless. Some are not.
I don't usually post on these idiotic contraception threads. I think it's prurient for men to sit around and muse about women's fertility. There is nothing anti-Scriptural about barrier contraception. Doctrinaire Roman Catholics, usually either over the age of 80 or under the age of 30, and often celibate themselves, jump on this foolish bandwagon and harp about men's prerogative to impregnate a woman as many times as they please.
I don't seek these threads out and I'd prefer not to be pinged to them.
Too many nutjobs.