Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Religion Moderator
The terms "Romanist" and "Papist" occur in sources offered from both sides of the debate. Likewise for the term "Snake Handlers" etc.

I am probably the most guilty of using the term "snake handler;" however, I am not aware of a single FReeper who has ever publicly or privately identified themselves as a member of a church where snake handling is practiced.

Am I to assume that terms that people such as Jesse Jackson use to describe Jews COULD NOT be used on here the way that Romanist and Papist is used?

193 posted on 07/23/2010 9:24:22 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee
Again, it depends on the usage. The article may be quoting Jesse Jackson and whatever term he used might be held up for disdain.

In the same way your use of the term "snake handler" to disparage a group of believers is acceptable on an "open" RF thread, a generalized or historical pejorative may be acceptable. But if the term is used to smear another Freeper, personally, it will result in a warning or perhaps the remark being pulled.

196 posted on 07/23/2010 9:39:16 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson