Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest
They may be interested in discussing it, but if they are not a member of the caucus, they must not discuss it on the caucus thread.

However, they are welcome to start a new, similiar "open" thread or to repost the same article at least four hours later as an "open" thread.

187 posted on 07/23/2010 9:18:51 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: Religion Moderator
Dear Religion Moderator,

“They may be interested in discussing it,...”

They may be more than interested in discussing it. In this case, were the LDS folks to strongly disparage the doctrine of the Trinity, and we Catholics gave an inadequate defense thereof, it seems unfair to me that other Trinitarians would be forbidden from entering the “caucus” thread.

But I see why you want to provide that option.

It is difficult for theological arguments to deepen when they are subject to the inanities of haters.

The parallel thread concept reduces a little the inherent injustice of the arrangement that you've created, while preserving the good that it does do.

Thanks for the clarifications.


sitetest

201 posted on 07/23/2010 10:08:00 AM PDT by sitetest ( If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson