Replies

I’m not Dr. Brian Kopp and if he wants to use the study and believes it’s valid, that’s his call.

Bringing up the fact that I, as an individual, don’t trust it is not going to win your argument with him because I don’t have a dog in the current controversy.

That’s between him and you or whoever he’s dealing with right now.

So leave my opinions out of it.

I don't have a dog in this fight over Barna. I don't know anything about him either way except what I've heard since post # 875, but I fail to see why his stats on divorce rates could be impugned by his biases.

However, we can pass over his stats and use the ones in post #877, from another source.

I’m not Dr. Brian Kopp and if he wants to use the study and believes it’s valid, that’s his call.

Bringing up the fact that I, as an individual, don’t trust it is not going to win your argument with him because I don’t have a dog in the current controversy.

That’s between him and you or whoever he’s dealing with right now.

So leave my opinions out of it.

With apologies to Dr. Brian Kopp in advance my response had nothing to do with him. I responded specifically to your response denigrading the "objectivity" of a BARNA Survey.

Your "dog" rejected the entire study because of the BARNA input. I repeat, ignore the BARNA input and comment on the entire survey(s).

Oh, and please leave Dr. Brian Kopp out of it. He is an innocent bystander.