Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: johngrace; small voice in the wilderness

Jesus had ample time after His resurrection to cover the whole communion and eucharist thing and there’s no record of it in the gospels.

He and His disciples, under the OT law, could not have eaten actual flesh and blood and remained clean for the Passover and Sabbath. Since the new covenant did not begin until after Christ’s death and resurrection, Jesus, who was the fulfillment of the Law could NOT have eaten blood and remained pure and eligible to become our sacrifice.


720 posted on 07/19/2010 8:49:47 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 687 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
HELLO, TRUTH!

Thanks metmom. That is truth that opens eyes and hearts.

721 posted on 07/19/2010 8:52:39 PM PDT by small voice in the wilderness (Defending the Indefensible. The Pride of a Pawn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 720 | View Replies ]

To: metmom

So sorry beg to differ. I believe in the free open exchange of ideas. But you did not understand. Imho Too much wrapping around verses on your own in these threads. I just think It’’s just not the way God intended. But I do believe we are Christian. I have friends who think like some on these threads. When they follow the Lord they call it a stewardship of his Grace. Then I ask them what if not. The response then that person never had it.


740 posted on 07/19/2010 10:31:03 PM PDT by johngrace (God so loved the world so he gave his only son! Praise Jesus and Hail Mary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 720 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson