[Deo volente]

Do you actually think I look for TRUTH from the Pope? LOL!

Yet you quoted the pope (out of context, it turns out) to attempt to prove your opinion that Mary was only the mother of Jesus' human nature. That's the unspoken premise behind your little "hit piece" of a post.

If you don't think he was speaking the truth there, why did you quote him and rely on his words to make your point?

You can't have it both ways. You can't deny on the one hand that he can speak truth and refer to him on the other to support one of your opinions. That's simply dishonest. You also can't assert that he can speak truth on one occasion yet is incapable of speaking it on another occasion that you yourself determine, because it makes a better fit for your specific talking point.

[presently no screen name]

That's the unspoken premise behind your little "hit piece" of a post.

NOW, I will call that READING MY MIND!! Let's hear what you have to say about that.

[xone]

Yet you quoted the pope (out of context, it turns out) to attempt to prove your opinion that Mary was only the mother of Jesus' human nature. That's the unspoken premise behind your little "hit piece" of a post. If you don't think he was speaking the truth there, why did you quote him and rely on his words to make your point? You can't have it both ways. You can't deny on the one hand that he can speak truth and refer to him on the other to support one of your opinions. That's simply dishonest. You also can't assert that he can speak truth on one occasion yet is incapable of speaking it on another occasion that you yourself determine, because it makes a better fit for your specific talking point.

So for Catholics quoting Luther, should the same apply?