This is often used as justification, but which places the infallible words of men above the infallible words of God, which commends common men for examining the very apostle’s preaching by the then-existing Scriptures. (Acts 17:11)
This reliance upon post-apostolic (Biblically speaking) sources also infers there was unanimous consent among the fathers on RC doctrine, which there was not, (http://www.equip.org/PDF/DC170-3.pdf) and that none support the primacy of Scripture (http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/sola-scriptura-earlychurch.html) and that terms such a “tradition” did not evolve in their meaning . (http://www.christiantruth.com/articles/livingtradition.html)
As God has affirmed the Scriptures as the only objective authority which is 100% inspired of Him, that is what must be the supreme doctrinal authority, versus holding an office to be infallible, based upon its infallible declaration that it is infallible when speaking according to its infallibly defined formula.
And plenty of pray before becoming Mormons or the like, and then there are the contrary testimonies from Rome to evangelical faith. (http://www.christiantruth.com/articles/Testimony.html)
Strawman.
As God has affirmed the Scriptures as the only objective authority which is 100% inspired of Him, that is what must be the supreme doctrinal authority,
Opinion of men that leads to multiple and contradictory conclusions.
And plenty of pray before becoming Mormons
I shared my experience. You are welcome to mock. I really don't care.