Resorting to ad hominem is an admission that you have neither the facts or an understanding of them on your side.
Why don't you check the study and get back to me with its complementary cumulative distribution function and whether it is a stretched exponential function. Since you and the Dr. insist on extrapolating its initial snapshot forward I'm sure you will support your position with the Rayleigh or continuous probability distribution calculations. If you can demonstrate that I made an error in my analysis I will admit it, but not without proof.