[Iscool]

As anyone can see the only objective standard for selecting a single website and rejecting literally millions of other contrary other sites is that it agree with you. (And you wonder why no one believes you....LOL)

I believe her...I don't believe you...

So instead of running your mouth, why not post an opposing view from another source???

[Natural Law]

"I believe her...I don't believe you..."

It doesn't surprise me. You don't believe Scripture and the entire revealed Word of God either. And if you had paid attention you would have seen plenty of contrary information posted. Besides, I am not trying to convince her or you. I simply do not believe anything she says or posts.

[Deo volente]

I have over 8 million links to “an opposing view from another source”:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&q=john+wayne+baptized+archbishop+panama&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=

She has ONE link:

http://www.adherents.com/people/pw/John_Wayne.html

that copies a “story” from another link which DOESN'T EXIST:

http://truthminers.com/hoaxarticles/john_wayne.htm

The “story” from her link can not be corroborated, because the source doesn't exist. What kind of proof is that?