I guess "readable" is in the eye of the beholder, no? You see, I "get" quix. I appreciate his humor, his wit, his sometimes amazing spiritual insight even though I may not always agree with his every post. I even like some of YOUR posts. :o)
LOL.
HERE IT IS IN MY USUAL ARIAL BLACK:
I don't recall any Proddys that chronically tend to post in such an attitude and style.
We may be skeptical but we extend at least a token amount of benefit of the doubt.
In POST AFTER POST AFTER POST AFTER POST
the Proddy assertions--even the excellent personal narrative at the beginning of this thread--is wholesale castigated as false just on the basis of very ignorant bias.
Sheesh what a collection of jerks.
THERE HAVE BEEN SEVERAL personal narratives of Evangelicals crossing the Tiber.
IIRC, NOT A SINGLE PRODDY HAS EVER POSTED A SIMILAR POST AGAINST SUCH A PERSONAL NARRATIVE. WE HAVE PERSISTENTLY TAKEN IT AS REAL AS STATED.
We may have quibbled with the reasonableness of the conclusions drawn leading to such a shift. However, we did not quibble WITH THE PERSON'S STATED PERSONAL EXPERIENCES.
We aren't that unrealistic, nor that stupid, nor that blind, nor that rigidly arrogantly biased. I can't even think of a single exception. Perhaps Alex Murphy will tell me if I'm wrong.
Incredible. WHAT OUTRAGEOUS DUPLICITY! WHAT A CHRONIC HORRIFIC DOUBLE STANDARD. AND NOT A SHRED OF EVER ADMITTING IT! SHEESH. I'm beginning to think that at least SOME Jihadi's might be more reasonable. Incredible.
BLESS YOU. Have a great weekend.