To: wagglebee
You see, this statement about the Resurrection makes no mention of Him dying for our sins and you say (by the way, it [the resurrection] is not a miracle, God need not perform miracle on Himself) that we only need the fact that He rose from the dead.Huh? The resurrection wasn't a miracle?
Was it the sign of Jonah?
This is pretty sad. RC apologists deny the resurrection was a miracle, but they think they see "miracles" all over the place in bleeding statues and burnt toast.
4,266 posted on
07/30/2010 6:24:55 PM PDT by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
This is pretty sad. RC apologists deny the resurrection was a miracle, but they think they see “miracles” all over the place in bleeding statues and burnt toast.
SHEESH.
It is sure clear now that the FR RC contingent has taken up full time residence in Alice’s rabbit hole.
Incredible.
4,269 posted on
07/30/2010 6:29:05 PM PDT by
Quix
(THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
"This is pretty sad. RC apologists deny the resurrection was a miracle..." Unless you can substantiate that without another of your Bagdhad-Bob rhetorical exercises we will just conclude it to be yet another lie.
4,286 posted on
07/30/2010 6:57:06 PM PDT by
Natural Law
(Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson