All you did was to do deceitful word substitution in quoting me and then sought to dismiss it when you cut and pasted my actual words. I said "Scripture was insufficient". You changed that to say I said the "Word of God" was insufficient. You did not attempt to present it as your interpretation or your belief, you cited me incorrectly and I believe it was deliberate. Anti-Catholics do that a lot.
Had you admitted, with some contrition, that it was an error it would be forgivable. Your transparent attempts to dismiss it in light of the corrections only repeats and compounds it not as an error but as a deliberate lie.
"Of course it isn't or God would not have added to the revealed Word of God through Apostolic tradition and subsequent revelation."
"To attempt to comprehend the entire revealed Word of God from Scripture alone is like trying to play solitaire with an incomplete deck."
You called it the *Word of God*. I changed nothing. In your own words, you said that the revealed Word of God wasn't sufficient otherwise Apostolic tradition and subsequent revelation would not have been added.