I'm not buying the innocent "who, me?" line. You changed my posting from my assertion that Scripture was insufficient to the "Word of God" was insufficient. That isn't the first time my statements have been manipulated to imply what was never stated nor the first time that you danced around in a "Perry Mason" monument when it was done.I won't assert motive out of respect to the RM and Forum Rules, but I personally think it is a reprehensible.
And the difference between *Scripture* and *the Word of God* is what precisely?
Do Catholics have their special Catholic only definitions of those words, too?
And the difference between *Scripture* and *the Word of God* is what precisely?
Do Catholics have their special Catholic only definitions of those words, too?
Besides, svitw used the word *Scripture* and you responded with “Of course it isn’t ....” and then continued with “or God would not have added to the revealed Word of God “.
If you don’t consider the *word of God* to be equivalent to *Scripture* then why did you use it in the same sense? Why did you reply to a comment about Scripture with a comment using the term *word of God*?