Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Deo volente; OLD REGGIE; Cronos; Mad Dawg; dsc
Peter is the rock on which Christ built His Church; Peter is the “rock of the Church”. Same thing. No difference. Peter is not THE Church, of course, but He is the rock on which the Church was built.

The complicating little factor there is Peter's own words in I Peter 2. HE considers Christ the stone upon which the church is built. He says nothing about himself.

“rock on...”, “rock of...”, same thing.

Hardly. There's a huge difference between building something *on* a rock and building it *of* rock.

I Peter 2: 4-8 As you come to him, the living Stone—rejected by men but chosen by God and precious to him— you also, like living stones, are being built into a spiritual house to be a holy priesthood, offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.

For in Scripture it says:
"See, I lay a stone in Zion, a chosen and precious cornerstone, and the one who trusts in him will never be put to shame."
Now to you who believe, this stone is precious. But to those who do not believe, "The stone the builders rejected has become the capstone," and, "A stone that causes men to stumble and a rock that makes them fall."

They stumble because they disobey the message—which is also what they were destined for.

2,696 posted on 07/27/2010 2:49:05 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2692 | View Replies ]


To: metmom; Deo volente; Cronos; Mad Dawg; dsc

No fair using Scripture. Shame on you.


2,721 posted on 07/27/2010 3:42:29 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2696 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson