Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Deo volente; OLD REGGIE

“Yes, it was because of his unshakable faith that Peter was chosen, but the Lord clearly made him the rock on which the Church was built. Simon’s name was changed by Jesus to Peter, which in Aramaic means “rock”. “Petros” is the Greek transliteration.”

Peter’s unshakable faith? Like when he denied Jesus three times just before His crucifixion? Um... OK.

http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/NTpdf/mat16.pdf

Now, I know that some Catholics aren’t concerned about the quality of their translations, that they don’t have a problem with poor translations, but just for the record, the Greek word for “Peter” is “petros”, and the Greek word for “rock” that Jesus used in saying *Upon this rock I will build my church* is “petra”.

Jesus didn’t say that He was going to build His church on a “petros” but on a “petra”.

More links to the Greek....

http://biblos.com/matthew/16-18.htm

http://biblelexicon.org/matthew/16-18.htm


2,657 posted on 07/27/2010 12:13:32 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2650 | View Replies ]


To: metmom; Cronos

The “petros” vs. “petra” issue:

http://www.catholic.com/library/Peter_the_Rock.asp

I’m glad I could clear that up for you!


2,661 posted on 07/27/2010 12:35:26 PM PDT by Deo volente (God willing, America will survive this Obamination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2657 | View Replies ]

To: metmom
Now, I know that some Catholics aren’t concerned about the quality of their translations, that they don’t have a problem with poor translations, but just for the record, the Greek word for “Peter” is “petros”, and the Greek word for “rock” that Jesus used in saying *Upon this rock I will build my church* is “petra”.

Jesus didn’t say that He was going to build His church on a “petros” but on a “petra”.

Gee, I wonder what the Aramaic feminine for Cephas is.

In their grasping at straws some think that a Greek writer would be comfortable giving a morphologically feminine name to a fellow of the guy persuasion. Of course to think this was meaningful that person would have to ignore the Pauline and Johannine witness to the name given to Simon bar Jonah, to wit: Cephas.

Why do these arguments get recycled and yet again recycled? Honest to goodness I sometimes think it's just an effort to tire us out with endless repetition of failed arguments rather than to pursue the truth.

2,662 posted on 07/27/2010 12:35:55 PM PDT by Mad Dawg (O Maria, sine labe concepta, ora pro nobis qui ad te confugimus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2657 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson