Posted on 07/18/2010 6:04:05 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Sometimes, I think this white hanky comes down and shields the text from their eyes . . .
then who knows what spiritual influences give them the
“NONSENSE FOR THE DAY”
or the
“NONSENSE FOR THE MOMENT”
via some sort of other dimensional Vatican Mind Meld, most likely, from the nether world.
The youtube video gives credit to, and has a link to abovetopsecret:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread599589/pg1
That video dates to March 8.
[The salesmen will purportedly be sporting tattooed-on straight faces-- that's the only way they could get them to stick.]
Im sure they have all sorts of sophistry to explain it. Even if we were to accept, for argument sake, that Mary was without original sin, all-holy seems like a term that should be designated only for God (or a goddess).
INDEED.
ABSOLUTELY, INDEED.
Likewise, God did not exempt Mary from Original Sin. To believe any creature is sinless is heresy and a blasphemy against the only sinless man, Jesus Christ.
AMEN.
It is a simple thing - Physical death is the consequence of original sin. Mary died. End of story.
INDEED.
History can be a troublesome thing, when youre trying to paint a pretty portrait of yourself...
OF COURSE.
That’s why the
VATICAN ALICE IN WONDERLAND SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY AND REALITY MANGLING
MANDATED STRETCHY HISTORY BOOKS FOR ALL THE FAITHFUL
VERY EARLY ON.
WOW.
WHAT AN HONOR to see you on such threads! Am humbled.
Thanks for your kind reply.
Have a blessed day at work and Prayers for the Friday situation. May God be with you mightily through all levels of the discussions and organization.
Here’s a link to a story about
“3 suns” visible in the Chinese sky.
Obviously UFO’s . . .
reminds those well informed of the Fatima series of UFO incidents.
OOOPS . . . here’s the link.
Some report Norton warns about the site.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3082230/Airports-giant-UFO.html
Those who would reject the existence on one holy catholic and apostolic (which, for me is found in the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches) find themselves in a tight spot when pinned down abou the basics.
At some level they know they need to align with the Christologic definitions that the councils delivered. At least, for me, when I actually read the councils, they proclaimed what I had been taught about who Jesus was (and was not).
I had no clue, until I began studying, that the questions were settled hundreds of years ago and that the answers were what I already believed. Of course, by then, I was honestly and passionately seeking - not defending a position.
So, was that a yes or a No — “could” doesn’t cut it — remember, I specifically asked you if you would worship in a Lutheran church will all the True Presence, incense, kneeling, crucifixes, icons and the like.
That Luther died of old age, fat and rich, belies the modern Protestant storyline that the Church was an omnipotent Machiavellian syndicate with KGB like hit squads.
The only thing it belies is the fake omnipotence angle. All else was true of the Catholic corruption at the time. The secular power of the CC was broken and had to be broken for the sickness that had invaded it. Because it couldn't remain faithful the world suffered.
Do all OPC'ers lie or only the few we bump into on FR? Are you capable of telling the truth about the Church or do you not understand the difference between having a path to Salvation, which all have, and actually navigating that path?
"A Lutheran service is not a Roman Catholic service. "
Does that mean you hate Lutherans only 90% as much as you hate Catholics?
It does not contain all knowledge in the sense that it does not tell us what Paul ate for breakfast or if Jesus was left handed.
It certainly DOES contain ALL the knowledge we need for salvation.
John 20:30 Jesus did many other miraculous signs in the presence of his disciples, which are not recorded in this book. 31 But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name.
The tape was made on August 2nd and released on August 3rd.
The so called "edit" you refer to says "3-8-10" which is AUGUST 3, NOT MARCH 8. You've got it backwards, dear.
LISTEN to it.
The guys says "this was taped YESTERDAY, AUGUST 2"
Forced? No one forces you to do anything. If you reject the truth you are doing so of your own volition.
For those honest enough to seek the truth my substantiation can be found at: The Code of Canon Law
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.