Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Testimony of a Former Irish Priest
BereanBeacon.Org ^ | Richard Peter Bennett

Posted on 07/18/2010 6:04:05 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

The Early Years

Born Irish, in a family of eight, my early childhood was fulfilled and happy. My father was a colonel in the Irish Army until he retired when I was about nine. As a family, we loved to play, sing, and act, all within a military camp in Dublin.

We were a typical Irish Roman Catholic family. My father sometimes knelt down to pray at his bedside in a solemn manner. My mother would talk to Jesus while sewing, washing dishes, or even smoking a cigarette. Most evenings we would kneel in the living room to say the Rosary together. No one ever missed Mass on Sundays unless he was seriously ill. By the time I was about five or six years of age, Jesus Christ was a very real person to me, but so also were Mary and the saints. I can identify easily with others in traditional Catholic nations in Europe and with Hispanics and Filipinos who put Jesus, Mary, Joseph, and other saints all in one boiling pot of faith.

The catechism was drilled into me at the Jesuit School of Belvedere, where I had all my elementary and secondary education. Like every boy who studies under the Jesuits, I could recite before the age of ten five reasons why God existed and why the Pope was head of the only true Church. Getting souls out of Purgatory was a serious matter. The often quoted words, "It is a holy and a wholesome thought to pray for the dead that they may be loosed from sins," were memorized even though we did not know what these words meant. We were told that the Pope as head of the Church was the most important man on earth. What he said was law, and the Jesuits were his right-hand men. Even though the Mass was in Latin, I tried to attend daily because I was intrigued by the deep sense of mystery which surrounded it. We were told it was the most important way to please God. Praying to saints was encouraged, and we had patron saints for most aspects of life. I did not make a practise of that, with one exception: St. Anthony, the patron of lost objects, since I seemed to lose so many things.

When I was fourteen years old, I sensed a call to be a missionary. This call, however, did not affect the way in which I conducted my life at that time. Age sixteen to eighteen were the most fulfilled and enjoyable years a youth could have. During this time, I did quite well both academically and athletically.

I often had to drive my mother to the hospital for treatments. While waiting for her, I found quoted in a book these verses from Mark 10:29-30, "And Jesus answered and said, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my sake, and the gospel's, But he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come eternal life." Not having any idea of the true salvation message, I decided that I truly did have a call to be a missionary.

Trying To Earn Salvation I left my family and friends in 1956 to join the Dominican Order. I spent eight years studying what it is to be a monk, the traditions of the Church, philosophy, the theology of Thomas Aquinas, and some of the Bible from a Catholic standpoint. Whatever personal faith I had was institutionalized and ritualized in the Dominican religious system. Obedience to the law, both Church and Dominican, was put before me as the means of sanctification. I often spoke to Ambrose Duffy, our Master of Students, about the law being the means of becoming holy. In addition to becoming "holy," I wanted also to be sure of eternal salvation. I memorized part of the teaching of Pope Pius XII in which he said, "...the salvation of many depends on the prayers and sacrifices of the mystical body of Christ offered for this intention." This idea of gaining salvation through suffering and prayer is also the basic message of Fatima and Lourdes, and I sought to win my own salvation as well as the salvation of others by such suffering and prayer.

In the Dominican monastery in Tallaght, Dublin, I performed many difficult feats to win souls, such as taking cold showers in the middle of winter and beating my back with a small steel chain. The Master of Students knew what I was doing, his own austere life being part of the inspiration that I had received from the Pope's words. With rigor and determination, I studied, prayed, did penance, tried to keep the Ten Commandments and the multitude of Dominican rules and traditions.

Outward Pomp -- Inner Emptiness

Then in 1963 at the age of twenty-five I was ordained a Roman Catholic priest and went on to finish my course of studies of Thomas Aquinas at The Angelicum University in Rome. But there I had difficulty with both the outward pomp and the inner emptiness. Over the years I had formed, from pictures and books, pictures in my mind of the Holy See and the Holy City. Could this be the same city? At the Angelicum University I was also shocked that hundreds of others who poured into our morning classes seemed quite disinterested in theology. I noticed Time and Newsweek magazines being read during classes. Those who were interested in what was being taught seemed only to be looking for either degrees or positions within the Catholic Church in their homelands.

One day I went for a walk in the Colosseum so that my feet might tread the ground where the blood of so many Christians had been poured out. I walked to the arena in the Forum. I tried to picture in my mind those men and women who knew Christ so well that they were joyfully willing to be burned at the stake or devoured alive by beasts because of His overpowering love. The joy of this experience was marred, however, for as I went back in the bus I was insulted by jeering youths shouting words meaning "scum or garbage." I sensed their motivation for such insults was not because I stood for Christ as the early Christians did but because they saw in me the Roman Catholic system. Quickly, I put this contrast out of my mind, yet what I had been taught about the present glories of Rome now seemed very irrelevant and empty.

One night soon after that, I prayed for two hours in front of the main altar in the church of San Clemente. Remembering my earlier youthful call to be a missionary and the hundredfold promise of Mark 10:29-30, I decided not to take the theological degree that had been my ambition since beginning study of the theology of Thomas Aquinas. This was a major decision, but after long prayer I was sure I had decided correctly.

The priest who was to direct my thesis did not want to accept my decision. In order to make the degree easier, he offered me a thesis written several years earlier. He said I could useit as my own if only I would do the oral defense. This turned my stomach. It was similar to what I had seen a few weeks earlier in a city park: elegant prostitutes parading themselves in their black leather boots. What he was offering was equally sinful. I held to my decision, finishing at the University at the ordinary academic level, without the degree.

On returning from Rome, I received official word that I had been assigned to do a three year course at Cork University. I prayed earnestly about my missionary call. To my surprise, I received orders in late August 1964 to go to Trinidad, West Indies, as a missionary.

Pride, Fall, And A New Hunger

On October 1, 1964, I arrived in Trinidad, and for seven years I was a successful priest, in Roman Catholic terms, doing all my duties and getting many people to come to Mass. By 1972 I had become quite involved in the Catholic Charismatic Movement. Then, at a prayer meeting on March 16th of that year, I thanked the Lord that I was such a good priest and requested that if it were His will, He humble me that I might be even better. Later that same evening I had a freak accident, splitting the back of my head and hurting my spine in many places. Without thus coming close to death, I doubt that I would ever have gotten out of my self- satisfied state. Rote, set prayer showed its emptiness as I cried out to God in my pain.

In the suffering that I went through in the weeks after the accident, I began to find some comfort in direct personal prayer. I stopped saying the Breviary (the Roman Catholic Church's official prayer for clergy) and the Rosary and began to pray using parts of the Bible itself. This was a very slow process. I did not know my way through the Bible and the little I had learned over the years had taught me more to distrust it rather than to trust it. My training in philosophy and in the theology of Thomas Aquinas left me helpless, so that coming into the Bible now to find the Lord was like going into a huge dark woods without a map.

When assigned to a new parish later that year, I found that I was to work side-by-side with a Dominican priest who had been a brother to me over the years. For more than two years we were to work together, fully seeking God as best we knew in the parish of Pointe-a-Pierre. We read, studied, prayed, and put into practise what we had been taught in Church teaching. We built up communities in Gasparillo, Claxton Bay, and Marabella, just to mention the main villages. In a Catholic religious sense we were very successful. Many people attended Mass. The Catechism was taught in many schools, including government schools. I continued my personal search into the Bible, but it did not much affect the work we were doing; rather it showed me how little I really knew about the Lord and His Word. It was at this time that Philippians 3:10 became the cry of my heart, "That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection...."

About this time the Catholic Charismatic movement was growing, and we introduced it into most of our villages. Because of this movement, some Canadian Christians came to Trinidad to share with us. I learned much from their messages, especially about praying for healing. The whole impact of what they said was very experience-oriented but was truly a blessing, insofar, as it got me deeply into the Bible as an authority source. I began to compare scripture with scripture and even to quote chapter and verse! One of the texts the Canadians used was Isaiah 53:5, "...and with his stripes we are healed." Yet in studying Isaiah 53, I discovered that the Bible deals with the problem of sin by means of substitution. Christ died in my place. It was wrong for me to try to expidite or try to cooperate in paying the price of my sin.

"If by grace, it is no more of works, otherwise grace is no more grace.." Romans 11:6. "All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all" (Isaiah 53:6).

One particular sin of mine was getting annoyed with people, sometimes even angry. Although I asked forgiveness for my sins, I still did not realize that I was a sinner by the nature which we all inherit from Adam. The scriptural truth is, "As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one" (Romans 3:10), and "For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23). The Catholic Church, however, had taught me that the depravity of man, which is called "original sin," had been washed away by my infant baptism. I still held this belief in my head, but in my heart I knew that my depraved nature had not yet been conquered by Christ.

"That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection..." (Philippians 3:10) continued to be the cry of my heart. I knew that it could be only through His power that I could live the Christian life. I posted this text on the dashboard of my car and in other places. It became the plea that motivated me, and the Lord who is Faithful began to answer.

The Ultimate Question

First, I discovered that God's Word in the Bible is absolute and without error. I had been taught that the Word is relative and that its truthfulness in many areas was to be questioned. Now I began to understand that the Bible could, in fact, be trusted. With the aid of Strong's Concordance, I began to study the Bible to see what it says about itself. I discovered that the Bible teaches clearly that it is from God and is absolute in what it says. It is true in its history, in the promises God has made, in its prophecies, in the moral commands it gives, and in how to live the Christian life. "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works" (II Timothy 3:16-17).

This discovery was made while visiting in Vancouver, B.C., and in Seattle. When I was asked to talk to the prayer group in St. Stephen's Catholic Church, I took as my subject the absolute authority of God's Word. It was the first time that I had understood such a truth or talked about it. I returned to Vancouver, B.C. and in a large parish Church, before about 400 people, I preached the same message. Bible in hand, I proclaimed that "the absolute and final authority in all matters of faith and morals is the Bible, God's own Word."

Three days later, the archbishop of Vancouver, B.C., James Carney, called me to his office. I was then officially silenced and forbidden to preach in his archdiocese. I was told that my punishment would have been more severe, were it not for the letter of recommendation I had received from my own archbishop, Anthony Pantin. Soon afterwards I returned to Trinidad.

Church-Bible Dilemma

While I was still parish priest of Point-a-Pierre, Ambrose Duffy, the man who had so strictly taught me while he was Student Master, was asked to assist me. The tide had turned. After some initial difficulties, we became close friends. I shared with him what I was discovering. He listened and commented with great interest and wanted to find out what was motivating me. I saw in him a channel to my Dominican brothers and even to those in the Archbishop's house.

When he died suddenly of a heart attack, I was stricken with grief. In my mind, I had seen Ambrose as the one who could make sense out of the Church-Bible dilemma with which I so struggled. I had hoped that he would have been able to explain to me and then to my Dominican brothers the truths with which I wrestled. I preached at his funeral and my despair was very deep.

I continued to pray Philippians 3:10, "That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection...." But to learn more about Him, I had first to learn about myself as a sinner. I saw from the Bible (I Timothy 2:5) that the role I was playing as a priestly mediator -- exactly what the Catholic Church teaches but exactly opposite to what the Bible teaches -- was wrong. I really enjoyed being looked up to by the people and, in a certain sense, being idolized by them. I rationalized my sin by saying that after all, if this is what the biggest Church in the world teaches, who am I to question it? Still, I struggled with the conflict within. I began to see the worship of Mary, the saints, and the priests for the sin that it is. But while I was willing to renounce Mary and the saints as mediators, I could not renounce the priesthood, for in that I had invested my whole life.

Tug-Of-War Years

Mary, the saints, and the priesthood were just a small part of the huge struggle with which I was working. Who was Lord of my life, Jesus Christ in His Word or the Roman Church? This ultimate question raged inside me especially during my last six years as parish priest of Sangre Grande (1979-1985). That the Catholic Church was supreme in all matters of faith and morals had been dyed into my brain since I was a child. It looked impossible ever to change.

Rome was not only supreme but always called "Holy Mother." How could I ever go against "Holy Mother," all the more so since I had an official part in dispensing her sacraments and keeping people faithful to her? In 1981, I actually rededicated myself to serving the Roman Catholic Church while attending a parish renewal seminar in New Orleans. Yet when I returned to Trinidad and again became involved in real life problems, I began to return to the authority of God's Word. Finally the tension became like a tug-of-war inside me. Sometimes I looked to the Roman Church as being absolute, sometimes to the authority of the Bible as being final. My stomach suffered much during those years; my emotions were being torn. I ought to have known the simple truth that one cannot serve two masters. My working position was to place the absolute authority of the Word of God under the supreme authority of the Roman Church.

This contradiction was symbolized in what I did with the four statues in the Sangre Grande Church. I removed and broke the statues of St. Francis and St. Martin because the second commandment of God's Law declares in Exodus 20:4, "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image...." But when some of the people objected to my removal of the statues of the Sacred Heart and of Mary, I left them standing because the higher authority, i.e., the Roman Catholic Church, said in its law Canon 1188: "The practise of displaying sacred images in the churches for the veneration of the faithful is to remain in force."

I did not see that what I was trying to do was to make God's Word subject to man's word. My Own Fault While I had learned earlier that God's Word is absolute, I still went through this agony of trying to maintain the Roman Catholic Church as holding more authority than God's Word, even in issues where the Church of Rome was saying the exact opposite to what was in the Bible.

How could this be? First of all, it was my own fault. If I had accepted the authority of the Bible as supreme, I would have been convicted by God's Word to give up my priestly role as mediator, but that was too precious to me. Second, no one ever questioned what I did as a priest.

Christians from overseas came to Mass, saw our sacred oils, holy water, medals, statues, vestments, rituals, and never said a word! The marvelous style, symbolism, music, and artistic taste of the Roman Church was all very captivating. Incense not only smells pungent, but to the mind it spells mystery.

The Turning Point

One day, a woman challenged me (the only Christian ever to challenge me in all my 22 years as a priest), "You Roman Catholics have a form of godliness, but you deny its power." Those words bothered me for some time because the lights, banners, folk music, guitars, and drums were dear to me. Probably no priest on the whole island of Trinidad had as colorful robes, banners, and vestments as I had. Clearly I did not apply what was before my eyes.

In October 1985, God's grace was greater than the lie that I was trying to live. I went to Barbados to pray over the compromise that I was forcing myself to live. I felt truly trapped. The Word of God is absolute indeed. I ought to obey it alone; yet to the very same God I had vowed obedience to the supreme authority of the Catholic Church. In Barbados I read a book in which was explained the Biblical meaning of Church as "the fellowship of believers." In the New Testament there is no hint of a hierarchy; "Clergy" lording it over the "laity" is unknown. Rather, it is as the Lord Himself declared "...one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren" (Matthew 23:8).

Now to see and to understand the meaning of church as "fellowship" left me free to let go of the Roman Catholic Church as supreme authority and depend on Jesus Christ as Lord. It began to dawn on me that in Biblical terms, the Bishops I knew in the Catholic Church were not Biblical believers. They were for the most part pious men taken up with devotion to Mary and the Rosary and loyal to Rome, but not one had any idea of the finished work of salvation, that Christ's work is done, that salvation is personal and complete. They all preached penance for sin, human suffering, religious deeds, "the way of man" rather than the Gospel of grace. But by God's grace I saw that it was not through the Roman Church nor by any kind of works that one is saved, "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast" (Ephesians 2:8-9).

New Birth at Age 48

I left the Roman Catholic Church when I saw that life in Jesus Christ was not possible while remaining true to Roman Catholic doctrine. In leaving Trinidad in November 1985, I only reached neighboring Barbados. Staying with an elderly couple, I prayed to the Lord for a suit and necessary money to reach Canada, for I had only tropical clothing and a few hundred dollars to my name. Both prayers were answered without making my needs known to anyone except the Lord.

From a tropical temperature of 90 degrees, I landed in snow and ice in Canada. After one month in Vancouver, I came to the United States of America. I now trusted that He would take care of my many needs, since I was beginning life anew at 48 years of age, practically penniless, without an alien resident card, without a driver's license, without a recommendation of any kind, having only the Lord and His Word.

I spent six months with a Christian couple on a farm in Washington State. I explained to my hosts that I had left the Roman Catholic Church and that I had accepted Jesus Christ and His Word in the Bible as all-sufficient. I had done this, I said, "absolutely, finally, definitively, and resolutely." Yet far from being impressed by these four adverbs, they wanted to know if there was any bitterness or hurt inside me. In prayer and in great compassion, they ministered to me, for they themselves had made the transition and knew how easily one can become embittered. Four days after I arrived in their home, by God's grace I began to see in repentance the fruit of salvation. This meant being able not only to ask the Lord's pardon for my many years of compromising but also to accept His healing where I had been so deeply hurt. Finally, at age 48, on the authority of God's Word alone, by grace alone, I accepted Christ's substitutionary death on the Cross alone. To Him alone be the glory.

Having been refurbished both physically and spiritually by this Christian couple together with their family, I was provided a wife by the Lord, Lynn, born-again in faith, lovely in manner, intelligent in mind. Together we set out for Atlanta, Georgia, where we both got jobs.

A Real Missionary With A Real Message

In September 1988, we left Atlanta to go as missionaries to Asia. It was a year of deep fruitfulness in the Lord that once I would never have thought was possible. Men and women came to know the authority of the Bible and the power of Christ's death and resurrection. I was amazed at how easy it is for the Lord's grace to be effective when only the Bible is used to present Jesus Christ. This contrasted with the cobwebs of church tradition that had so clouded my 21 years in missionary garments in Trinidad, 21 years without the real message.

To explain the abundant life of which Jesus spoke and which I now enjoy, no better words could be used than those of Romans 8:1-2: "There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death." It is not just that I have been freed from the Roman Catholic system, but that I have become a new creature in Christ. It is by the grace of God, and nothing but His grace, that I have gone from dead works into new life.

Testimony to the Gospel of Grace

Back in 1972, when some Christians had taught me about the Lord healing our bodies, how much more helpful it would have been had they explained to me on what authority our sinful nature is made right with God. The Bible clearly shows that Jesus substituted for us on the cross. I cannot express it better than Isaiah 53:5: "But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed." (This means that Christ took on himself what I ought to suffer for my sins. Before the Father, I trust in Jesus as my substitute.)

That was written 750 years before the crucifixion of our Lord. A short time after the sacrifice of the cross, the Bible states in I Peter 2:24: "Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed."

Because we inherited our sin nature from Adam, we have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. How can we stand before a Holy God -- except in Christ -- and acknowledge that He died where we ought to have died? God gives us the faith to be born again, making it possible for us to acknowledge Christ as our substitute. It was Christ who paid the price for our sins: sinless, yet He was crucified. This is the true Gospel message. Is faith enough? Yes, born-again faith is enough. That faith, born of God, will result in good works including repentance: "For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them" (Ephesians 2:10).

In repenting, we put aside, through God's strength, our former way of life and our former sins. It does not mean that we cannot sin again, but it does mean that our position before God has changed. We are called children of God, for so indeed we are. If we do sin, it is a relationship problem with the Father which can be resolved, not a problem of losing our position as a child of God in Christ, for this position is irrevocable. In Hebrews 10:10, the Bible says it so wonderfully: "...we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all."

The finished work of Christ Jesus on the Cross is sufficient and complete. As you trust solely in this finished work, a new life which is born of the Spirit will be yours -- you will be born again.

The Present Day

My present task: the good work that the Lord has prepared for me to do is as an evangelist situated in the Pacific Northwest of the U.S.A. What Paul said about his fellow Jews I say about my dearly loved Catholic brothers: my heart's desire and prayer to God for Catholics is that they may be saved. I can testify about them that they are zealous for God, but their zeal is not based in God's Word but in their church tradition. If you understand the devotion and agony that some of our brothers and sisters in the Philippines and South America have put into their religion, you may understand my heart's cry: "Lord, give us a compassion to understand the pain and torment of the search our brothers and sisters have made to please You. In understanding pain inside the Catholic hearts, we will have the desire to show them the Good News of Christ's finished work on the Cross."

My testimony shows how difficult it was for me as a Catholic to give up Church tradition, but when the Lord demands it in His Word, we must do it. The "form of godliness" that the Roman Catholic Church has makes it most difficult for a Catholic to see where the real problem lies. Everyone must determine by what authority we know truth. Rome claims that it is only by her own authority that truth is known. In her own words, Cannon 212, Section 1, "The Christian faithful, conscious of their own responsibility, are bound by Christian obedience to follow what the sacred pastors, as representatives of Christ, declare as teachers of the faith or determine as leaders of the Church." (Vatican Council II based, Code of Canon Law promulgated by Pope John-Paul II, 1983).

Yet according to the Bible, it is God's Word itself which is the authority by which truth is known. It was man-made traditions which caused the Reformers to demand "the Bible only, faith only, grace only, in Christ only, and to God only be the glory."

The Reason Why I Share

I share these truths with you now so that you can know God's way of salvation. Our basic fault as Catholics is that we believe that somehow we can of ourselves respond to the help God gives us to be right in His sight. This presupposition that many of us have carried for years is aptly defined in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1994) #2021, "Grace is the help God gives us to respond to our vocation of becoming his adopted sons...."

With that mindset, we were unknowingly holding to a teaching that the Bible continually condemns. Such a definition of grace is man's careful fabrication, for the Bible consistently declares that the believer's right standing with God is "without works" (Romans 4:6), "without the deeds of the Law" (Romans 3:28), "not of works" (Ephesians 2:9), "It is the gift of God," (Ephesians 2:8). To attempt to make the believer's response part of his salvation and to look upon grace as "a help" is to flatly deny Biblical truth,

"...if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace..." (Romans 11:6). The simple Biblical message is that "the gift of righteousness" in Christ Jesus is a gift, resting on His all-sufficient sacrifice on the cross, "For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ" (Romans 5:17).

So it is as Christ Jesus Himself said, He died in place of the believer, the One for many (Mark 10:45), His life a ransom for many. As He declared, ...this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins" (Matthew 26:28). This is also what Peter proclaimed, "For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God..." (I Peter 3:18).

Paul's preaching is summarized at the end of II Corinthians 5:21, "For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.." (II Cor. 5:21).

This fact, dear reader, is presented clearly to you in the Bible. Acceptance of it is now commanded by God, "...Repent ye, and believe the gospel" (Mark 1:15).

The most difficult repentance for us dyed-in-the-wool Catholics is changing our mind from thoughts of "meriting," "earning," "being good enough," simply to accepting with empty hands the gift of righteousness in Christ Jesus. To refuse to accept what God commands is the same sin as that of the religious Jews of Paul's time, "For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God." (Romans 10:3)

Repent and believe the Good News!

Richard Bennett

A native of Ireland he returned there in 1996 on an evangelistic tour. He now lives in Portland Oregon U.S.A. He teaches a workshop at Multnomah Bible College on "Catholicism in the Light of Biblical Truth." His greatest joy is door-to-door witnessing . He has produced three series of radio broadcasts. A fourth series is about to begin in the Philippines on D.W.T.I. and D.V. R .O. radio stations. He is co-editor of this book and founder of the ministry named "Berean Beacon."


TOPICS: Catholic; Evangelical Christian; Ministry/Outreach
KEYWORDS: catholic; ireland; irish; priest; undeadthread
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 4,921-4,9404,941-4,9604,961-4,980 ... 7,601-7,615 next last
To: OLD REGGIE
"I suggessted nothing except that there was no "anti Catholic" anything in 60AD."

Except for Rome, of course, which was the most powerful state on earth at the time. (unless you are resorting to word games and card tricks to try to prove your point).

4,941 posted on 08/01/2010 9:22:31 AM PDT by Natural Law (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4937 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
Jesus quoted from Hebrew Scripture frequently but never quoted from the so-called Apocrypha.

I believe that is one of the criteria of canonical testing.

If it were important for us to know
Yah'shua would have cited from them.

shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
4,942 posted on 08/01/2010 9:24:27 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4937 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
"Your religion takes a handfull of scriptures, out of context, and then hundreds of different authors write commentaries, or novels trying to get those few verses to justify your religion..."

What an excellent characterization of the "Reformation".

4,943 posted on 08/01/2010 9:24:30 AM PDT by Natural Law (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4929 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente; Jvette; Mad Dawg; Patrick Madrid
That’s the tired, OLD fallacy of argumentum ad hominem. Pretty lame.

Go right ahead, address and refute his points. Be my guest! If he’s so wrong, it should be a piece of cake to demolish his argument. They might even publish you in one of your protestant journals. You’ll be a sensation!

Don’t call him names. That’s playground stuff, only worthy of a little child who doesn’t get his way. Man up, now, and refute him!

We’re waiting breathlessly.

How many are included in your "We're"? Tell them to take a breath now and then or they'll surely die. That would be group suicide.

How can you say I was calling him names when I clearly acknowledged he was a Professional Apologist for Catholic Answers? Is that true?

I am a tired old fogey approaching 80 with no background whatsoever in Debate (I might have taken 3-6 semester hours of Logic back in the middle ages) and would surely be overmatched.

Breath now.

4,944 posted on 08/01/2010 9:37:59 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4771 | View Replies]

To: Jvette
It is not my fault that sola scriptura cannot stand the test of Scripture.

I have a feeling you have no idea what Sola Scriptura is.

Enlighten me.

4,945 posted on 08/01/2010 9:47:13 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4797 | View Replies]

To: Quix; Irisshlass; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
Quix writes
It's amazing that they BRAZENLY DENY that they are worshiping her and have elevated her into Jr God status . . .
The TRUTH bothers Quix. Help him/her shake off the blindness and see and hear reality.
4,946 posted on 08/01/2010 9:49:05 AM PDT by narses ( 'Prefer nothing to the love of Christ.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4916 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
I wasn't arguing. I was stating facts.

Opinion:There was no such thing as a Catholic Church.

Opinion, because of "valid': The Council of Jamnia compiled the only valid Scripture.

It is only by the application of a standard for a theory of how the Church grew that one can say that the early Church was not the Catholic Church.

It is only by the application of a standard that one can say only the Hebrew Scriptures comprise the 'valid' OT.

Right or wrong, it was a position statement.

OK.

4,947 posted on 08/01/2010 9:52:14 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4808 | View Replies]

To: narses; Quix
"The TRUTH bothers Quix"

I honestly don't believe he understands the concept. He is not alone amongst the anti-Catholics We know and they know who they are).

The most glaring example is the daily insistence that we Catholics are wrong when we state what we believe and the Church is wrong when it clearly documents what we believe. However, any source or poster, that affirms his preclusions, no matter how dubious or oft refuted, just has to be right.

Rather than enter into legitimate dialog comparing or contrasting the Catholic belief system to his form of Protestantism we are subjected to flippant strawman statements and lectures telling us that we actually believe something different than we say we do.

4,948 posted on 08/01/2010 10:01:49 AM PDT by Natural Law (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4946 | View Replies]

To: narses

I think Quix is just jealous. After being denied a spot with the Backstreet Boys, Quix decided to try for popularity with the Catholics. Since that also failed, the obvious response is to slander the Church and promote libleous claims. This is obviously an attempt to garner popularity before trying to break onto the Teen Disney scene.

It’s the only logical explanation for Quix’s behavior.


4,949 posted on 08/01/2010 10:02:28 AM PDT by HushTX (quit whining)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4946 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente; Iscool; MarkBsnr; Jvette; Mad Dawg; NYer; narses
(Iscool) “...the followers of Peter...built a religion regardless of what the scripture says...They couldn’t back up their religion with scripture so they invented some, and took over pagan rituals and superstitions and you are part of what it is today...”

Nonsense. There are tons of Scriptures that back up Catholic doctrine.

Just for starters:

http://www.scripturecatholic.com/

(over 2,000 Scripture selections at this site alone which defend Catholic teaching)

Agreed. Much of Catholic Doctrine is backed up by Scripture.

As Iscool says the evolved RCC cannot back up their entire doctrine with Scripture so they invented some, etc.

4,950 posted on 08/01/2010 10:04:53 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4815 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE

“Agreed. Much of Catholic Doctrine is backed up by Scripture.”

Good, an honest answer.

Then you say:

“RCC cannot back up their entire doctrine with Scripture so they invented some, etc.”

OK, name two or three “invented” doctrines that you claim are NOT backed up by scripture, can you? BTW, what denomination do you belong to? What are the doctrines that you believe that somehow contradict a doctrine that the Catholic Church teaches?


4,951 posted on 08/01/2010 10:08:37 AM PDT by narses ( 'Prefer nothing to the love of Christ.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4950 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
"As Iscool says the evolved RCC cannot back up their entire doctrine with Scripture..."

The Catholic never accepted that Scripture is the only source of the Revealed Word of God. Honest Protestants agree with this position too. But since you profess to be wiser than the Church Fathers and 2000 years of Catholic clergy and laity perhaps you can tell us how Scripture was to be the font of all that is Holy for the 350 years before the canon and 1500 years before the invention of the printing press and accompanying mass literacy.

Another question that has puzzled me for a while: How much success have Protestant missionaries had passing out leaflets and Bibles to illiterate, and stone-age jungle tribesmen?

4,952 posted on 08/01/2010 10:24:41 AM PDT by Natural Law (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4950 | View Replies]

Comment #4,953 Removed by Moderator

To: Iscool
Can you imagine their pope washing someone's feet.

Exactly! For appearance sake only - for photo op purposes - it's not from the heart when there is a mindset you must kiss my ring and genuflect when in the presence of the Pope and then off to the marble palace. And I will tell you what to believe, I will explain the decrees to you, my little subjects of my 'religious' empire.

All the pomp and circumstances with head gear, glittering robes, bowing and 'proper protocol' - all secular, all power driven and NOTHING to do with how Jesus lived his life or Paul or Peter BUT everything to do with King Herod.
4,954 posted on 08/01/2010 10:36:15 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4852 | View Replies]

To: Quix; Deo volente; smvoice; stfassisi; Dr. Eckleburg; betty boop; Iscool; MarkBsnr; OLD REGGIE
Thank you for all the pings to this thread, dear brother in Christ!

I have been reading along with much interest but have mostly withheld comment because there was a long stretch of “all heat, no light.”

Now I would like to add “two cents” for the discussion.

It seems to me that a lot of the angst between the Catholic and non-Catholic Christians may stem from traditions of the Catholic Church which have accumulated over the years in an attempt to communicate doctrine to the illiterate masses.

For instance, there is a lot of “acting out” of Church doctrine such as making the cross over the chest, walking forward to touch or kiss a wooden cross at Easter, kneeling before statues, kissing the ring of a religious authority, sprinkling themselves with water and so on.

God instructed some of the Old Testament prophets to act out His prophecies. And by washing the apostles’ feet Jesus acted out the doctrine of helping one another to rid ourselves of the earthly concerns we gather as we walk in Him in this mortal life. It was not about feet:

Jesus knowing that the Father had given all things into his hands, and that he was come from God, and went to God; He riseth from supper, and laid aside his garments; and took a towel, and girded himself. After that he poureth water into a bason, and began to wash the disciples' feet, and to wipe [them] with the towel wherewith he was girded.

Then cometh he to Simon Peter: and Peter saith unto him, Lord, dost thou wash my feet?

Jesus answered and said unto him, What I do thou knowest not now; but thou shalt know hereafter.

Peter saith unto him, Thou shalt never wash my feet. Jesus answered him, If I wash thee not, thou hast no part with me. Simon Peter saith unto him, Lord, not my feet only, but also [my] hands and [my] head.

Jesus saith to him, He that is washed needeth not save to wash [his] feet, but is clean every whit: and ye are clean, but not all. For he knew who should betray him; therefore said he, Ye are not all clean.

So after he had washed their feet, and had taken his garments, and was set down again, he said unto them, Know ye what I have done to you?

Ye call me Master and Lord: and ye say well; for [so] I am. If I then, [your] Lord and Master, have washed your feet; ye also ought to wash one another's feet. For I have given you an example, that ye should do as I have done to you. – John 13:3-15

So perhaps the Catholic Church continued the tradition of acting things out to teach doctrines, based on such examples in Scripture?

Likewise, I strongly suspect the opulent attire of Catholic men consecrated to God – whether Pope, Cardinal, Bishop, etc. – was an “acting out” of doctrines involving the separation between the spiritual and the earthly with an emphasis on which is to be preferred. Ditto for the opulent buildings, art, altars and devices used in the Mass.

Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean [thing]; and I will receive you, - I Cor 6:17

For those of us who are plain and simple Christians, opulence is in opposition to the words of God. Indeed, austerity would be closer to the words of God if we wanted to act things out, i.e. take with us only that which God leads us to take. The Amish come to mind as an assembly that "acts out" that austerity.

And Jesus saith unto him, The foxes have holes, and the birds of the air [have] nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay [his] head. – Matthew 8:20

And he said unto them, When I sent you without purse, and scrip, and shoes, lacked ye any thing? And they said, Nothing. Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take [it], and likewise [his] scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. – Luke 22:35-36

We are more likely to teach language skills in our missionary efforts where needed rather than to act things out. And we are more inclined to teach the lesson behind a Scriptural acting out than to merely reenact it.

Then again, the Church was commissioned to preach the Gospel back when most people were illiterate. To their target audience, a picture was quite literally worth a thousand words. A statue of a saint suggests in visual form that a Christian life well lived is honorable and desirable - and honoring that saint in a litany reminds the illiterate that the sanctified Christian life is above the mortal coil.

Now for my complaint.

I believe the Catholic Church was faithful in getting the initial message out there to the illiterate masses but I also believe it has fallen short by not following-through with the converts after confirmation. Where the indigenous indians quite literally moved into the Spanish Missions, there was follow-through. But where the converts simply walked out the door back into their secular life there was not adequate follow-through.

The Catholics on Free Republic are very knowledgeable in their beliefs and in the doctrine of the Church. But “out there” in the secular world, by my experience, they would be the exception, not the rule. Most of the Catholics other than family who I engage in casual conversation – and I am not talking about trying to convert them to any other Christian doctrine – seem to be very hesitant to discuss Christ or their beliefs and/or seem to be ill informed.

Truly, they remind me of those who received an education and then forgot most of it as they went off pursuing life. Continuing education makes sense in many professions and it should be standard among all Christians, Catholic or not.

One would expect those who embrace the doctrine of “once saved, always saved” would be the least inclined to continue their Christian education. But that is not true, on my experience they are often the most driven to ask, seek and knock.

Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you: For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened. - Matt 7:7-8

But more disturbingly, there was obviously insufficient follow-through in the Caribbean because the residents, back in the throes of their secular environment, seemed to think it was ok to blend Catholic doctrines with their own religious traditions giving rise to Santeria. And I have read on this forum from a missionary in the Philippines that even today some receive the Catholic doctrine and, back in their secular environments, blend it with their own Buddhist traditions even to the point they make household shrines with statues of Mary alongside statues of Buddha.

To me, this is a case of the “acting out” back-firing for lack of follow-through.

In the modern secular world, the Christian whether Catholic or not who is not following-through may be inclined to blend whatever doctrine he learns with New Age mysticism or even whatever he may find appealing in modern fiction, e.g. Star Wars' midichlorians, Star Trek's alien nations, Harry Potter's white magic or even (God forbid) benevolent vampires ala Twilight.

I do “get” the point that the Mass is mostly worship whereas the Protestant Service is mostly teaching and it would be wrongful to elevate education to worship. But, in my view, the Catholic Church needs to develop an infrastructure to deal with the masses, whether literate or not, after they walk out the door.

Here they could learn something from the Protestants. In particular, they could encourage small groups within the congregation to get together and socialize on their own in one another’s homes for the purpose of discussing the daily Scripture readings and the doctrines of the Church. In a “Bible Study” like this, it should be lay people talking to one another – priests could unintentionally stifle a group from sharing their views.

And yes I am aware of the Catholic use of television and the internet – but there is nothing quite as effective as the group, which is interactive, reinforcing, social - and people often open up with real world problems, bizarre thoughts or dreams or fears - and are willing to listen to someone who cares enough about the words of God to be there. The focus on Scripture would help all the members in the group to keep themselves centered on God’s will in their secular lives after they walk out the doors.

Any hoot, that’s my “two cents” for the discussion…

God's Name is I AM.

4,955 posted on 08/01/2010 10:40:23 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4916 | View Replies]

To: Quix
SATURATE THAT BOOK

What book does that all that heresy come from?
4,956 posted on 08/01/2010 10:48:31 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4919 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

“Here they could learn something from Protestants...”

We have what are called Small Christian Communities and we meet to discuss the bible and Scriptures application to our lives. They are communities within the larger community of the parish in addition to formalized bible study.

If I may say so, you don’t understand the Mass. Unless you understand The Presence, you don’t understand us.

This is a disgustingly nasty thread. I have Protestant friends, evangelical friends, mennonite friends and if they thought like this thread reflects, I would never speak to them again.


4,957 posted on 08/01/2010 10:50:09 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4955 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
Thank you for sharing your experiences, dear brother in Christ!

Where do the Small Christian Communities meet? And how often? Who attends?

4,958 posted on 08/01/2010 10:54:41 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4957 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
"seem to be very hesitant to discuss Christ or their beliefs and/or seem to be ill informed."

Thank you for the intelligent discourse. Salvation is a very personal and private issue for Catholics. I think this stems from a knowledge or belief that we are all sinners and at final judgment we will stand alone before God.

Non-Catholics often confuse the cultural and traditional aspects of Catholicism with Apostolic Tradition or an embrace of paganism. A perfect example is the placement of a Holy Water font at the entrance of a Church. Every Roman home had such a font at the entrance, whether a fountain, pond, or simple clay bowl and visitors to a home would make a washing of hands and feet a ritual of respect to the home owner before entering. To not do so was a serious affront and insult. How much greater an insult would it have been for anyone to enter the house of God without showing a similar respect?

4,959 posted on 08/01/2010 10:56:53 AM PDT by Natural Law (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4955 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
you don’t understand

Reading the mind of another Freeper is a form of "making it personal."

Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.

4,960 posted on 08/01/2010 10:57:17 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4957 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 4,921-4,9404,941-4,9604,961-4,980 ... 7,601-7,615 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson