Replies

Perhaps you can look up Colofornian's posting history & tell me how often she posts threads about anything but bashing "Mormons". It's easy to do. At the home page, go to the upper right hand corner & type her name in the search & then select "user" from the drop down. This is a conservative & political board & yet I'm not sure I can find any posts from her that doesn't have to do w/ Mormons. Perhaps, but I doubt it. She's one of many examples, but she's a good one.

Do you always misrepresent like this, Reno?

I did exactly as you instructed: First page that popped up was this thread (a Non-Mormon thread)...My posts #55, 379, 544, 558, 578, and 605 were not about Mormonism -- and I don't believe the people I posted to were Mormons.

Then scroll down: Double-digits posting on a thread about Tibet & Buddhism from a July 6 thread.

This is a conservative & political board...

If you want my political comments from June, find a few Sharron Angle threads and look there...I commented extensively in one of them. Or just pull up the very recent Boston Globe article about Mitt Romney. (Romney still qualifies as "political" in your book doesn't he?) And if you don't like the host having a "religion" section, perhaps you can try to do to it what Smith did to the Nauvoo Expositor...'cause I see you've embraced that "root out" spirit of Smith.

Now, let's talk about another form of deception.

Mormonism? Or just your posts? Again, you give us a fresh example:

"Many of you mormons hide behind CAUCUS designations, you won’t engage in OPEN forums and claim a 1001 reasons why you won’t, but won’t give 1 reason why you should." [Szonian]

Your response: I don't believe you'll find ONE POST OR THREAD that was a caucus thread from me.

Hmmm...Less than a week ago -- in fact almost 6 days to the hour...you wrote: "Good posts Rip & Jeff. Could there be a more important time in our history to understand these words?" [post #10, July 1, 2010, http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2544884/posts on Ripliancum thread The Constitution--A Glorious Standard (LDS Caucus)] So, Reno, you've just shown the world you not only misrepresent my posting history --I didn't have to go past my own first page to find 16 posts to prove you wrong; you’ve misrepresented your own -- I didn't have to go even a week of your posting history to prove you wrong.

[Perhaps an Inman could post a "double face palm" graphic to match our reaction to your deceptive boldness]

Misrepresenting? Did I state my comments definitively? Or did I state "yet I'm not sure I can find any posts from her that doesn't have to do w/ Mormons. Perhaps, but I doubt it.

Now, tell me dear Colo. what percentage of your posting history deals w/ Mormons vs. anything else, especially the substantive posts? Get it?

As far as my caucus post, again, I stated "I DON"T BELIEVE"... I had forgotten that 5 WORD POST. I've probably done likewise in the past. Do you consider that truly representative of my posting history & anything of substance? I never stated without a shadow of a doubt, I never...... Straining at a gnat perhaps?

As far as my misrepresentation in the post to Godzilla you referred to, I explained the circumstances & duly apologized at the time, as is incumbent for a follower of Christ to do when he is found to be wrong & has mis-spoken. Godzilla graciously accepted my apology for which I was grateful. Any apologies from the "anti's" lately for their foibles? Hmmmm.

Got to answer a few more here, then I'm back to my part in capitalism, & the defeat of Harry Reid. Have a good one.