Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: presently no screen name
In my more than two decades of hanging out on the internet in various forms, I have observed repeatedly that attempting to read "the other guy's" mind, and presuming to know his beliefs, his thought patterns, his practices better than he knows them, serves no good purpose.

In the long run, such actions only make one look prideful and ridiculous ... and produce needless, worthless, anger. Flame wars result when no moderator exists to extinguish them.

45 posted on 07/06/2010 8:25:16 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: ArrogantBustard
Flame wars result when no moderator exists to extinguish them.

Are you saying you lucked out today? I'm asking, I'm not reading your mind.

Furthermore, I wasn't reading your mind - you specifically stated what was on your mind/thought.

such actions only make one look prideful and ridiculous

Now for a refresher...back to eye splint log....
50 posted on 07/06/2010 8:32:15 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: ArrogantBustard; presently no screen name

I have observed repeatedly that attempting to read “the other guy’s” mind, and presuming to know his beliefs, his thought patterns, his practices better than he knows them, serves no good purpose.

- - - - - - -
That presumes 2 things. 1) That the ‘other guy’ is actually telling the truth about his teachings/practices/beleifs and 2) that the person involved does not know the other guys beliefs (or churches beliefs) better or has not been a member of that church.

For example, as a former Mormon, I am keenly aware of LDS beliefs/history/practices and I do know them better than most members (and did when I was LDS), furthermore I am aware (and was guilty of when I was LDS) of their practice of ‘lying for the Lord’ where omission obfuscation and outright lying is considered ok as long as it protects the Mormon church.

Finally, I am often attacked, without any proof, of taking things out of context, lying, etc. when I can (and do) back up my assertions while those who attack me do not.

There are some who will hate you, lie about you, and attack you just because you are telling them the truth, in a loving manner but because they do not like the MESSAGE, they attack the MESSENGER.

The Message of Christ crucified is offensive to many.


63 posted on 07/06/2010 8:45:24 AM PDT by reaganaut (ex-mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson