[xzins]

you have to believe in both

That seems to be an admission that you believe in neither since one of the two is pink unicorns. But, I think you've sort of said the same in other ways in the past.

You do, however, seem to be drawn to religious things. I think d'fendr noted that recently, and there's really no denying it.

Wonder why? What do you think?

[kosta50]

You do, however, seem to be drawn to religious things. I think d'fendr noted that recently, and there's really no denying it

My interests are Church and Bible history. Theological arguments, theories, well up I suppose as natural offshoots of that work.

For example I just discovered today that Act 13:48 in the Latin Vulgate Bible was altered under Augustine's (4th century) influence by inserting the prefix prae to the word ordinatti to conform the scriptures to Augustinian doctrine of predestination.

Thus, the verse reads praeoridnatti (pre ordianed, preset, prearranged) instead of simply arranged/ordained (oridantti) as it read before. Thus, more evidence of corruption of biblical manuscripts in the early Church for doctrinal reasons.

Fascinating. The things they didn't tell my in Sundays chool. :)