To: xzins
Bultman’s heresy involved rejection of the deity of Christ and of the resurrection. Therefore, it does matter His arguments regarding John's Gospels have nothing to do with that. I invite you to show that he says on that subject is wrong. Origen was a Christological heretic, yet he still forms the bulwark of early Christian apologetics.
515 posted on
07/12/2010 7:12:14 AM PDT by
kosta50
(The world is the way it is even if YOU don't understand it)
To: kosta50
yet he still forms the bulwark = yet he doesn’t form a bulwork
516 posted on
07/12/2010 7:13:56 AM PDT by
kosta50
(The world is the way it is even if YOU don't understand it)
To: kosta50; Alamo-Girl; P-Marlowe; count-your-change
Bultman considered everything about Christianity to be myth, kosta. In sum, he taught that none of it happened...except that some guy was killed by the Romans.
He sure as heck isn’t gonna think Jesus is the “I am”. In fact, he considered the “I am” to be myth, too.
His scholarship is simply irrelevant.
517 posted on
07/12/2010 7:28:58 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson