[roamer_1]

Except when they’re used - in this case - to end discussion and put down the people they’re used against.

“He’s just a preterist. Nothing to see here. Move along.”

"In this case..." Hmmm... When did I do that? Don't get me wrong, I am directly in opposition to Preterism, but I did not use you poorly at all.

I called your theory "Classic Preterism," which, in point of fact, it seems to be. True?

[Stingray]

More history and facts:

http://tinyurl.com/39e3y5p

Educate yourselves, if you dare.

[Stingray]

“I called your theory “Classic Preterism,” which, in point of fact, it seems to be. True?”

I call it “Christ’s words backed by historical evidence.”

So again, I reject your attempts to pigeon-hole me into a box of your choosing.