Replies

I think it’s a gross mangling of Scripture to even say that Christ came in judgment of Jerusalem in 70AD.

So are you denying the demonstrable historical reality that Jerusalem fell in 70 AD? Are you denying that Temple sacrifices have been finished once and for all? Are you denying that any of the physical seed of Abraham is capable of being a member of the Church?

OTOH, are you claiming that to deny Christ and return to animal sacrifices is pleasing to God? Are you suggesting that God wants Jews to be separate from the Church?

There’s not a shred of Scripture to say that HE did.

Don't you feel kind of stupid for making that statement? Since the Canon of Scripture was written before 70AD, it is rather obvious that they would not report on that which had not yet happened.

An angel would have been sufficient.

That is what I would expect Joseph Smith or any other garden variety heretic to say. St Paul specifically warned us to avoid "...an angel from heaven..." telling us a different gospel. Dispensationalism is, by definition, another Gospel.

so much even partial Preterist hogwash...

You are condemning the teachings of your own Church. Surely you must have more spiritual enlightenment than the Pope, and your insults and taunts are clearly words that are edifying.