Obviously debating to you means "agreeing with." That's novel. Debates, dear mom, are by definition encounters of opposite minds. We don't have presidential candidate debates because the candidates think alike, but because they disagree.
but [someone who] seems to make it their [sic] life’s mission to cast doubt and dispersion on the Bible and it’s truthfulness for the sole purpose of destroying another’s faith
How do you know that? Why don't you ask such individuals what their "life's mission" is rather than speculate they have one and what its "sole purpose" is?
As someone commented, why should anyone take the interpretation of the Bible of a self-proclaimed agnostic seriously?
Maybe you can tell me why should anyone take seriously biblical interpretations by a self-proclaimed believer? Especially, since there are so many variations in interpretations by vairous believers!
vairous =various