Prove it. I say that I was not. And I certainly never had any of your crowd attempt to refute that statement with any seriousness. Do you wish to attempt it now? If not, then retract your accusations.
You, OTOH, had only your goofy opinion that Paul was not Trinitarian.
Already proven with more than adequate Pauline verse. Do you require more? Say so and I shall. But do me the favour this time and actually respond instead of slinking away like a wet cat from the fire hose of Scripture. So this time you jump through the hoops, Mark. You disprove 2,000 years of Christianity. You labeled Paul anti-Trinitarian, a slander denied by the Christian world, so you prove your opinion which swims and sinks against the current.
You cannot bear to be truthful, can you? Ever? I never say that Paul was anti Trinitarian. I said that he did not preach the Trinitarian formula. You are a wonder, Dr. E. Perhaps you will meet yourself coming around a corner one day...
Perhaps one day, you will become honest...
"Paul definitely is not Trinitarian." -- Posted by MarkBsnr on April 24, 2010.
Thank you for the very apt example of shoddy, dishonest Roman Catholic apologetics.