Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evangelical Leaders are Ok with Contraception
NAE ^ | June 9, 2010

Posted on 06/09/2010 6:00:15 AM PDT by NYer

Evangelical leaders are overwhelmingly open to artificial methods of contraception, according to the April Evangelical Leaders Survey. Nearly 90 percent said they approved of artificial methods of contraception. In a separate poll conducted by the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) in partnership with Gallup, Inc., 90/91 percent of evangelicals find hormonal/barrier methods of contraception to be morally acceptable for adults.1



“Most associate evangelicals with Catholics in their steady leadership in pro-life advocacy, and rightly so,” said Leith Anderson, president of the NAE. “But it may come as a surprise that unlike the Catholic church, we are open to contraception.”

Indicative of their commitment to honoring the sanctity of human life, several leaders included caveats in their affirmative answers saying while they approve of contraception, they would strongly object to drugs or procedures that terminate a pregnancy once conception has taken place. George Brushaber, president emeritus of Bethel University, said that contraception should be used “with proper biblical and medical guidance.”

“Personally, I don’t believe there are any Scriptural prohibitions to most common methods of contraception,” said Randy Bell of the Association for Biblical Higher Education. “I can say from personal experience that God can defeat such methods if he chooses to do so.”

Many noted that biblical sexuality is not limited to procreation, but that its purpose extends to the consummation and expression of love within marriage. “Our leaders indicate that contraception can be utilized if all biblical purposes of sex are upheld and that it may actually aid in keeping the balance,” Anderson said.

Greg Johnson, president of Standing Together, approves of artificial methods of contraception, but added, “I believe the church does have a responsibility to communicate and preach the importance of family and that couples should not carelessly allow themselves to use contraception as a way to avoid having children and a growing family altogether.”

Two leaders said they would not approve or disapprove, but would leave it to married couples to decide based on the ethical and biblical criteria of a given situation.

The NAE Generation Forum’s publication, “Theology of Sex,” is a resource to help ministers and church leaders create healthy dialogue about God’s intentions for sex. For more information on the Generation Forum or the “Theology of Sex” publication, visit www.naegeneration.com.

The Evangelical Leaders Survey is a monthly poll of the Board of Directors of the National Association of Evangelicals. They include the CEOs of denominations and representatives of a broad array of evangelical organizations including missions, universities, publishers and churches.



1Gallup conducted this national telephone survey of 1,000 evangelicals, ages 18-95, from July 7 – Aug 1, 2009. Evangelicals were identified by denominational affiliation, church attendance at least once a month, accepting Jesus Christ as Savior and affirming the Bible as the written word of God and a guide for life. This poll has an overall margin of error of ±3.1 percent.


TOPICS: Catholic; Evangelical Christian; Ministry/Outreach; Moral Issues
KEYWORDS: antiprotestantism; contraception; evangelical; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-220 next last
To: Tax-chick

Excellent post, TC.


121 posted on 06/10/2010 6:23:18 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

In your opinion, is sex sinful unless it is intended to lead to pregnancy?


122 posted on 06/10/2010 6:24:02 AM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 16 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

Yes. Is that simple, categorical, comprehensive enough? Just ... yes.


123 posted on 06/10/2010 6:25:17 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Be nice to venomous snakes. They only want to eat a mouse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

ping


124 posted on 06/10/2010 6:27:45 AM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 16 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Outstanding post!


125 posted on 06/10/2010 6:27:52 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

Whether or not a sexual act is intended to produce a child - that’s what “pregnancy” means, after all, that a child has been created - is not a factor in whether the particular act is sinful or not.


126 posted on 06/10/2010 6:28:01 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Be nice to venomous snakes. They only want to eat a mouse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; trisham

Thanks! Maybe I’m a radical feminist, after all: the unquestioned assumption that a normally-functioning female body (and female psyche) is BAD, needs to be FIXED, really bothers me.


127 posted on 06/10/2010 6:29:36 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Be nice to venomous snakes. They only want to eat a mouse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; trisham; samiam1972
Thanks! Maybe I’m a radical feminist, after all: the unquestioned assumption that a normally-functioning female body (and female psyche) is BAD, needs to be FIXED, really bothers me.

I wouldn't say that the normally-functioning female psyche is "bad", just peculiar. :-)

I was assured just a couple weeks ago be several female FReepers that women are better at giving directions than men, of course none of them offered anything in the way of proof.

128 posted on 06/10/2010 6:33:41 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I’m a slave to the Mapquest, myself ;-).


129 posted on 06/10/2010 6:34:59 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Be nice to venomous snakes. They only want to eat a mouse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor; Tax-chick; trisham; Mrs. Don-o; Dr. Brian Kopp
In your opinion, is sex sinful unless it is intended to lead to pregnancy?

I don't see where anyone has made that suggestion.

Let's look at it another way, do you believe that a sexual act that is INTENDED to PREVENT pregnancy is sinful?

130 posted on 06/10/2010 6:36:20 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I bought my wife a GPS and she still calls me all the time asking for directions. Her idea of a landmark is, “I’m sort of near that restaurant where we ate a few years ago and you didn’t really like it; I don’t remember the name of it, but I think you had a steak.”


131 posted on 06/10/2010 6:38:38 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“Let’s look at it another way, do you believe that a sexual act that is INTENDED to PREVENT pregnancy is sinful?”

I do not believe that any sexual act between two married, consenting adults is sinful, wether it is intended to lead to pregnancy or not.


132 posted on 06/10/2010 6:39:14 AM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 16 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor; Tax-chick; trisham; Mrs. Don-o; Dr. Brian Kopp
I do not believe that any sexual act between two married, consenting adults is sinful, wether it is intended to lead to pregnancy or not.

I don't disagree with you, but that wasn't my question. I asked about sex that was specifically intended to PREVENT a pregnancy.

133 posted on 06/10/2010 6:50:53 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“I asked about sex that was specifically intended to PREVENT a pregnancy.”

Of course I don’t believe that is sinful.


134 posted on 06/10/2010 6:52:08 AM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 16 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

My son runs the GPS for me, if I haven’t been able to get a Mapquest printout.

The very concept of this topic, in a way, is part of the larger question we’re discussing. Men and women are different, in obvious and less-obvious ways. However, the urge to define categories of “better” or “worse” that apply to either sex as a whole is, simply, a function of sin. Why else would we be, even “in fun,” setting ourselves up against each other.


135 posted on 06/10/2010 7:02:58 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Be nice to venomous snakes. They only want to eat a mouse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor; wagglebee
That was the Puritan opinion. It was not and is not the Catholic position.

The Catholic position is that the act must be open to life, not that every sex act is intended to lead to pregnancy.

Obviously, sex that is not fertile through no fault of the couple (i.e., post menopause, one of the spouses is sterile through natural medical conditions or for example post chemotherapy, etc) is morally licit.

136 posted on 06/10/2010 7:04:06 AM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

Thank you for that polite and succinct answer. Some of your contemporaries could learn a thing or two.


137 posted on 06/10/2010 7:05:21 AM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 16 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor; Tax-chick; trisham; Mrs. Don-o; Dr. Brian Kopp
Of course I don’t believe that is sinful.

If you don't believe that doing something specifically intended to prevent a pregnancy is sinful, what about something specifically intended to END a pregnancy?

138 posted on 06/10/2010 7:15:55 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Men and women are different, in obvious and less-obvious ways. However, the urge to define categories of “better” or “worse” that apply to either sex as a whole is, simply, a function of sin. Why else would we be, even “in fun,” setting ourselves up against each other.

I agree, I was just trying to inject some humor.

139 posted on 06/10/2010 7:16:53 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; wagglebee

Agreed. I think it’s a foreign concept to many, but once one examines it, it is eye-opening.


140 posted on 06/10/2010 7:21:46 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-220 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson