Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CTrent1564
Again, the theological basis for the Holy Trinity is in the Scriptures as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are all mentioned. What is not formally defined is the relatioshhip among the 3 Divine Persons of Trinity as that was formally defined at the Councils of Nicea (325 AD) and Constantinopiile (381 AD).

In other words then, it's a wild guess...It's not an understanding, it's a decree...And it has no more meaning that what you or I may come up with to define and describe the Trinity...All that we know about the Trinity is in the scriptures, alone...

91 posted on 06/02/2010 4:19:32 PM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Iscool

Iscool:

No, the Councils of the Church represent the CHurch speaking with authority under the guidance of the Holy Spirit and notice that Nicea (325 AD) and Constantinopile (381 AD) both occurred before the NT canon was totally defined at the Councils of Hippo and Carthage, 393 and 397, respectively.

So I believe the Creeds, dogmatic doctrinal statements from those Councils, are authoritative otherwise we fall into Lone ranger Christianity, which is ultimately where you end up, i.e. that you are in essence your own Church Council and/or Pope. I believe what they believe and they professed back then what I believe now and those Same Church Fathers in the early Church are the same ones who decided the orthodox biblical canon versus the canons held by various heretical gnostic sects and the faith of the Fathers and their understanding of the scriptures reflects the theology of the CHurch that was used to define doctrines at these same Councils.


96 posted on 06/02/2010 8:01:08 PM PDT by CTrent1564
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson