Wrong that was not dismissed but clearly to be seen....I did take note he did not explain what he ment by “trace evidence”...which could mean anything he wants it to mean unless he detailed that...he did not.
And once again 30000 or 100000000000 pieces of information will not convince me.....show me the alien...not some blurred photo of a UFO...or papers of acccounts.....just as you said there is so much phoney baloney mixed in with it all that if their is any truth in there it surely gets lost in the pile of junk.
Sounds like you are determined
ABSOLUTELY DETERMINED
to suffer the consequences of a huge
TYPE II ERROR
quite unnecessarily and illogically.
One doesn’t need to go to the absolutely OTHER EXTREME to avoid a TYPE I ERROR.
The fellow presenting his talk on the 3,000+ cases DID discuss details . . . most convincingly. I forget what tangible things he had there.
Stan Romanek had a great variety of tangible evidence for us to view and even touch.