Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken4TA
No one would misunderstand Jesus comparison of his flesh to manna, the manna, the bread from heaven, being the only food sustaining the Israelites for so long.

What do subsequent events show? Well, Jesus had no blood drained from him for his disciples to drink, a violation of the Mosaic Law that Jesus and they were under at the time.
And no flesh removed from his body. (Yes, I know, but you asked my take).

Every language has all sorts of ways of expressing ideas just as in English. The bread and wine represented Jesus’ flesh and blood, no cannibals and vampires amongst the disciples.

2,608 posted on 05/11/2010 12:22:05 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2606 | View Replies ]


To: count-your-change
Every language has all sorts of ways of expressing ideas just as in English. The bread and wine represented Jesus’ flesh and blood, no cannibals and vampires amongst the disciples.

True. However, when partaking of the bread and fruit of the vine, we do distinquish that it's the body and blood of Christ that was shed for us. The whole thing is that we do this action to remember His death, burial and resurrection until He come again. That is the important part!

Thanks for your input. It's appreciated.

2,613 posted on 05/11/2010 12:54:37 PM PDT by Ken4TA (The truth hurts those who don't like truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2608 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson