I have no interest in rebuking any of your writings. Your website shows a failed Catholic kinda wandering along out there with a moderate form of mild Christianity. Your writings are based upon a firm misconception that came to fruition during the Reformation - that one may interpret Scripture as one chooses. We’ve seen churches come and churches go during 2 millennia of Christianity. The Reformation started with a bang and it’s finishing up with a whimper. Most churches of men do.
I figured you might say something like that :-) - however, I have the idea you may not be able to rebuke anything I've said with any sort of reasoned intelligence backed up with biblical teachings.
Your website shows a failed Catholic kinda wandering along out there with a moderate form of mild Christianity.
That's your opinion. However, the thousands that have visited my site are of a different opinion, and have stated a desire to learn more - asking reasonable and intelligent questions; many are Catholics (CINO or not).
Your writings are based upon a firm misconception that came to fruition during the Reformation
My start in writing articles were done without addressing anything the reformers said or done. In fact, it was a long while after I started that I investigated the reformers; my attention was with what the partisans of the RCC had to say.
The Reformation started with a bang and it’s finishing up with a whimper. Most churches of men do.
I've never ever thought of starting a "church". And never will! As for the reformation, well, they did call attention to the false teachings of the RCC, which they can be commended for. As for what they accomplished, well, that's a mixed bag to say the least.