Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
Not entered into canon DOES NOT mean it was fake.

Origen was among the first to point out it was a fake and also discounted the notion that Mary did not have any other children. The Protoevangelium of James was very popular because of a desire to know of Jesus' early life.

The ignorance of Jewish life is another indication of it being a forgery.

However, the desire for a Mother goddess has always been popular.

241 posted on 04/30/2010 5:43:04 PM PDT by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]


To: wmfights
Origen was among the first to point out it was a fake and also discounted the notion that Mary did not have any other children.

Do you have a citation on that?

It doesn't much matter, but I'm curious.

Origen was a heretic anyway; he believed that the Devil and his angels could perhaps be saved someday, and he also castrated himself.

All I know is that when Helvidius claimed that Mary had other (biological) children in the 4th C., both Jerome and the Pope of Rome at the time violently rejected his error.

As did both Luther and Calvin, much later of course.

378 posted on 04/30/2010 9:35:56 PM PDT by Campion ("President Barack Obama" is an anagram for "An Arab-backed imposter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson