[Mad Dawg]

However, I don't think any non-Catholic will accept your answers.

Two things:

(1)I was once a non-Catholic and I accepted them.

(2)What interests me is that the people who don't accept this don't often present coherent arguments too explain why they don't accept it.

[Ken4TA]

"However, I don't think any non-Catholic will accept your answers."

Two things:
(1)I was once a non-Catholic and I accepted them.
(2)What interests me is that the people who don't accept this don't often present coherent arguments too explain why they don't accept it.

1. - That's your experience. I can't relate to that as I came out of the RCC when discovering the falsehood.

2. - The subject matter is what is found in Catholic dogma and in may RC books written by approved RC writers and endorsed by the Hierarchy of the RCC. Your trying to explain them away using Philosophical reasoning is not all that pertinent. In fact, it changes what is plainly stated. Opponents to it need not present any argument to explain as the subject matter plainly reveals itself. All one has to do is to say it is false. Why? The Bible doesn't say it! Does that compute for you?