So if such ideas are found in Scripture, please inform me!
And thus, as the human race fell into bondage to death by means of a virgin, so is it rescued by a virgin;This is where one starts to want the original (instead of this klunky translation).
BUT, as I read this, Mary's "rescue" is presented as, so to speak, proportionate to Eve's getting us in the soup. SO, again as I read it (past tense, I was just sort of reading along ...) Ireneaus was saying that Eve contributes to our condemnation -- starts the process by which we end up in the soup -- and Mary contributes to our redemption.
And that's the say in which Mary's "fiat" balances Eve's disobedience. I'm seeing it like this:
Eve | Adam | Mary | Jesus |
---|---|---|---|
'starts' fall by eating 'apple', offering to adam | Completes Fall by accepting 'apple' from Eve | 'starts' redemption by accepting vocation and 'bearing the fruit', to wit: Jesus | completes redemption by life, cross, etc. |
listens to lucifer | ... | Listens to Gabriel | ... |
takes fruit from tree | ... | bears fruit FOR tree (cross) | ... |
As to the "patroness" (advocate) thing, for us we all get to choose for whom we pray, and Mary by (through grace) getting it right seems suited to advocate for Eve. I don't know what theological proposition arises from this.
I know some folks here have said some of Irenaeus is spurious, and I must say this line of thought, tabulation, tidying things up strikes me as kind of late medieval-- that's just an impression.