Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: count-your-change
But now it’s the children that enticed the perverted clerics into sin? I’ve heard pedophiles claim that their victims enticed them but I thought the foolishness of such an arguement would be obvious. Guess not.

Please. Ephebophiles. TEENS. It's not a foolish argument, it's reality. If you're going to bash the Church, do so from a position of REALITY. In case you've forgotten, we send CHILDREN (young adults) into war.

A definition: (From wikipedia, but it's accurate)

Because most late adolescents have physical characteristics near (or in other cases, identical) to that of full-grown adults, some level of sexual attraction to persons in the age group is common among adults of all sexual orientations.[6] The term ephebophilia is used only to describe the preference for mid-to-late adolescent sexual partners, not the mere presence of some level of sexual attraction. Such a distinct preference for individuals in mid or late adolescence is not generally regarded by psychologists as a pathology when it does not interfere with other major areas of one's life. Ephebophilia is not listed by name as a mental disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR), or the ICD-10, nor is it listed as a paraphilia. This is as opposed to pedophilia, which is categorized as a specific disorder in those systems with its own diagnostic criteria. However, ephebophilia can sometimes be diagnosed as a disorder if it results in dysfunction or exploitative behavior, either under the DSM specification 309.2, "Paraphilia Not Otherwise Specified", or under the ICD-10 F65.8 "Other disorders of sexual preference".[14][15]

63 posted on 04/19/2010 2:18:08 AM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Judith Anne
Corrupt altar boys seducing innocent priests??? Call it “church bashing” if you will, but that is the most foul and ridiculus defence I’ve ever encountred!

But if Wikipedia says that raping a thirteen year old is somehow qualitativly different than raping a ten year old that makes all the difference, doesn’t it? But perhaps not if you think both were lying.

What an utterly disgusting line of rationalizing nonsense!!!

80 posted on 04/19/2010 7:39:41 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson