I didn't ask Judith Anne I asked you and your silence and obfuscation is deafening.
I don't know what was accomplished by copying the Reichbishop on this.
Your post #390 asked me nothing. Your post #388 asked me the question, and I quote:
Wouldn't you agree that those who exploit the victims for political or sectarian purposes are nearly as guilty as those who exploit them for sexual gratification?Point "i" in my post 399 summarized your charge.
Silence in regards to abuses by clergy shows a lack of care and concern for the victims. Speaking out in regards to abuses by clergy is exploiting the victims in order to harm others.My post #389 shows your 26 attempts to post about abuses within my church. By your logic, I should be deafened by your thread posting history, which shows you've never posted a single thread about the abuse problems that occured within your own church. Indeed, one might deduct from said history a "lack of care and concern for the victims". One might deduct a greater concern for politics than for church matters of any kind.
So what was the purpose in attempting 26 posts about another's church abuse issues, if not to (in your words) "exploit the victims for political or sectarian purposes"?
You're obviously not referring to Alex Murphy since you're asking him the question. I doubt you use that term for Judith Anne. So that leaves me as the person you are labeling as "Reichbishop."
The last post you made calling me a "Reichbishop" was removed by the Religion Moderator.
Roman Catholic apologists break the rules consistently. Stop breaking the rules.