[Quix]

Awwwwwww

Perhaps Prottys could canvas some taxidermists to see if a collection could be taken up for the rabid cliques to gain some thicker skins.

Prottys have collectively and individually been called every foul thing in the book hereon from the beginning by Papists—and often a lot not in the book.

Goes with the territory.

Except for personally personhood harsh assaults, we usually hardly bat an eye or slow down over it.

It’s amazing how many Roman Catholics et al fail to realize that some of us Prottys haul out annoying terms primarily or only when the Papists get particularly obnoxious, prissy and assaultive.

stimulus followed by response

LOL.

[Uri’el-2012]

It’s amazing how many Roman Catholics et al fail to realize that some of us Prottys haul out annoying terms primarily or only when the Papists get particularly obnoxious, prissy and assaultive.

I believe that we realize the words of Yah'shua:

Mat 5:11 "Blessed are you when people insult you
and persecute you, and falsely say all kinds
of evil against you because of Me.

There is wheat and there is chaff.

shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach

[Running On Empty]

“..us Prottys haul out annoying terms primarily or only when the Papists get particularly obnoxious, prissy and assaultive.””stimulus followed by response.”

OK

I’m interested in the term “us Prottys”. Does this mean that you speak for all “Prottys”, some who are “us” or does “us Prottys” refer particularly to yourself -—and the ones on your ping list?

“..haul out annoying terms”—
Would you agree then that some terms used, such as “Papists”, can be annoying?

“...primarily or only when the Papists get particularly obnoxious, prissy and assaultive.” Which is it?—primarily or only?

If “Papists get particularly obnoxious,(very unpleasant), prissy (fussy) and assaultive” (violent attack either physical or verbal), does this apply to all, to some, to few? Are these traits absent from “Protty” posts?

“Stimulus followed by response.”

How true. And it works both ways.