It was a legitimate comparison pf psychological pathologies in which the absence of an object or attribute results in feelings of inferiority and psychic conflict.
Your fixating on the word "penis" in that analogy is the subject of a whole other psychological pathology.
The scandal belongs to the papacy. The sin belongs to the papacy. The cover-up is engineered by the papacy. The victims are destroyed by the papacy.
And what do Roman Catholic apologists do?
They blame everyone else.
Um, so it’s OK for you to make the analogy to start with but not OK for someone to call you on it?
Why do you excuse yourself but not others?